Agarwal Ritesh, Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Gupta Dheeraj, Behera Digamber, Jindal Surinder K
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Chest. 2006 Sep;130(3):724-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.3.724.
Outcomes in patients with ARDS/acute lung injury (ALI) may be dependent on the underlying cause. We describe the case mix, clinical behavior, and outcomes of patients with ALI/ARDS resulting from pulmonary causes (ALI/ARDSp) and extrapulmonary causes (ALI/ARDSexp).
Retrospective study conducted between January 2001 and June 2005.
Respiratory ICU (RICU) of a tertiary care hospital in northern India.
All patients fulfilling the criteria for ALI/ARDS and requiring mechanical ventilation for > 24 h.
Of the 180 patients (ARDS, 140 patients; ALI, 40 patients), 123 patients had ALI/ARDSp, whereas 57 patients had ALI/ARDSexp. The most common cause of ALI/ARDSp was infective pneumonia, whereas the most common cause of ALI/ARDSexp was sepsis. At ICU admission, although patients with ALI/ARDSexp were sicker than those with ALI/ARDSp, there was no difference between the two groups of patients in the development of new organ dysfunction/failure (Delta sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] scores) or the time to develop the first organ dysfunction/failure (assessed by SOFA scores). The median length of RICU stay was similar in the two groups (5 days [interquartile range (IQR), 6 days] vs 5 days [IQR, 9.5 days], respectively, in patients with ALI/ARDSp and ALI/ARDSexp; p = 0.4). The hospital mortality rate was 47.8% and was not significantly different between the two groups (ALI/ARDSp group, 43.1%; ALI/ARDSexp group, 57.9%; p = 0.06). Multivariate analysis showed the following risk factors for death in the ICU: female gender (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.94); SOFA scores (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.3); and DeltaSOFA scores (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.41). There was no significant effect of the category of ARDS on outcome (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8 to 3.2).
Although patients with ALI/ARDSexp are sicker on ICU admission, the underlying cause of ARDS does not affect the length of ICU stay or hospital survival time.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)/急性肺损伤(ALI)患者的预后可能取决于潜在病因。我们描述了由肺部原因(ALI/ARDSp)和肺外原因(ALI/ARDSexp)导致的ALI/ARDS患者的病例组合、临床行为及预后。
2001年1月至2005年6月进行的回顾性研究。
印度北部一家三级护理医院的呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)。
所有符合ALI/ARDS标准且需要机械通气超过24小时的患者。
180例患者(ARDS患者140例,ALI患者40例)中,123例为ALI/ARDSp,57例为ALI/ARDSexp。ALI/ARDSp最常见的病因是感染性肺炎,而ALI/ARDSexp最常见的病因是脓毒症。在ICU入院时,尽管ALI/ARDSexp患者比ALI/ARDSp患者病情更重,但两组患者新器官功能障碍/衰竭的发生情况(Delta序贯器官衰竭评估[SOFA]评分)或首次出现器官功能障碍/衰竭的时间(通过SOFA评分评估)并无差异。两组RICU住院时间中位数相似(ALI/ARDSp组为5天[四分位间距(IQR),6天],ALI/ARDSexp组为5天[IQR,9.5天];p = 0.4)。医院死亡率为47.8%,两组间无显著差异(ALI/ARDSp组为43.1%,ALI/ARDSexp组为57.9%;p = 0.06)。多因素分析显示ICU死亡的以下危险因素:女性(比值比[OR],0.49;95%置信区间[CI],0.25至0.94);SOFA评分(OR,1.18;95%CI,1.07至1.3);以及DeltaSOFA评分(OR,1.24;95%CI,1.09至1.41)。ARDS类别对预后无显著影响(OR,1.6;95%CI,0.8至3.2)。
尽管ALI/ARDSexp患者在ICU入院时病情更重,但ARDS的潜在病因并不影响ICU住院时间或医院生存时间。