Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603 Japan.
J Intensive Care. 2014 Mar 25;2(1):24. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-24. eCollection 2014.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by the increased pulmonary permeability secondary to diffuse alveolar inflammation and injuries of several origins. Especially, the distinction between a direct (pulmonary injury) and an indirect (extrapulmonary injury) lung injury etiology is gaining more attention as a means of better comprehending the pathophysiology of ARDS. However, there are few reports regarding the quantitative methods distinguishing the degree of pulmonary permeability between ARDS patients due to pulmonary injury and extrapulmonary injury.
A prospective, observational, multi-institutional study was performed in 23 intensive care units of academic tertiary referral hospitals throughout Japan. During a 2-year period, all consecutive ARDS-diagnosed adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation were collected in which three experts retrospectively determined the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to ARDS. Patients were classified into two groups: patients with ARDS triggered by extrapulmonary injury (ARDSexp) and those caused by pulmonary injury (ARDSp). The degree of pulmonary permeability using the transpulmonary thermodilution technique was obtained during the first three intensive care unit (ICU) days.
In total, 173 patients were assessed including 56 ARDSexp patients and 117 ARDSp patients. Although the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was significantly higher in the ARDSexp group than in the ARDSp group, measurements of the pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) were significantly elevated in the ARDSp group on all days: at day 0 (2.9 ± 1.3 of ARDSexp vs. 3.3 ± 1.3 of ARDSp, p = .008), at day 1 (2.8 ± 1.5 of ARDSexp vs. 3.2 ± 1.2 of ARDSp, p = .01), at day 2 (2.4 ± 1.0 of ARDSexp vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 of ARDSp, p = .01). There were no significant differences in mortality at 28 days, mechanical ventilation days, and hospital length of stay between the two groups.
The results of this study suggest the existence of several differences in the increased degree of pulmonary permeability between patients with ARDSexp and ARDSp.
This report is a sub-group analysis of the study registered with UMIN-CTR (IDUMIN000003627).
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的特征是弥漫性肺泡炎症和多种来源的损伤导致肺通透性增加。特别是,区分直接(肺损伤)和间接(肺外损伤)肺损伤病因作为更好地理解 ARDS 病理生理学的一种手段越来越受到关注。然而,关于由于肺损伤和肺外损伤导致 ARDS 患者的肺通透性程度的定量方法的报道很少。
在日本的 23 个学术三级转诊医院的重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、多机构研究。在 2 年期间,收集了所有需要机械通气的连续诊断为 ARDS 的成年患者,其中三位专家回顾性确定导致 ARDS 的病理生理机制。患者分为两组:由肺外损伤引起的 ARDS(ARDSexp)和由肺损伤引起的 ARDS(ARDSp)。在第一个三个重症监护病房(ICU)天期间使用经肺热稀释技术获得肺通透性程度。
共评估了 173 例患者,包括 56 例 ARDSexp 患者和 117 例 ARDSp 患者。尽管 ARDSexp 组的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分明显高于 ARDSp 组,但 ARDSp 组在所有天的肺血管通透性指数(PVPI)均明显升高:第 0 天(ARDSexp 为 2.9±1.3,ARDSp 为 3.3±1.3,p=0.008),第 1 天(ARDSexp 为 2.8±1.5,ARDSp 为 3.2±1.2,p=0.01),第 2 天(ARDSexp 为 2.4±1.0,ARDSp 为 2.9±1.3,p=0.01)。两组在 28 天死亡率、机械通气天数和住院时间方面无显著差异。
本研究结果提示 ARDSexp 和 ARDSp 患者肺通透性增加程度存在一些差异。
本报告是在 UMIN-CTR(IDUMIN000003627)注册的研究的子组分析。