Turrina Cesare, Valsecchi Paolo, Bonomi Silvia, Corsini Paola, Cacciani Paolo, Medea Gerardo, Brignoli Ovidio, Sacchetti Emilio
University Psychiatric Unit, Brescia University School of Medicine and the Department of Mental Health, Brescia Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;8(4):192-7. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v08n0401.
This study investigated the level of knowledge about schizophrenia of primary care doctors working in the city of Brescia, Italy, and variables associated with better information.
The study design was devised after 2 joint meetings with leading figures of the Italian College of General Practitioners. A cross-sectional evaluation of 215 general practitioners was performed (June 2002). A random subgroup was selected to participate in a 4-month retest session in order to evaluate the reliability of the schedule (October 2002). The setting was the local health unit of Brescia, which involves 706 primary care doctors working in the city and its province. Of these, 30.5% took part in the study. A structured self-report questionnaire (SAKS) was devised for this study. General practitioners were also asked to rate videotaped cases of 5 patients with different DSM-IV diagnoses. The main outcome measures were the scores from subscales measuring knowledge of schizophrenia symptoms and signs, knowledge of antipsychotics and their adverse events, and correct diagnoses of 5 videotaped cases.
Primary care doctors identified positive (79.0%), negative (72.6%) and general (72.1%) symptoms of schizophrenia (p < .001). Of the 5 cases on videotape, they correctly rated a mean of 3.1 cases. The mean percentage of anti-psychotics correctly identified was 34.1% (older) and 51.2% (novel) (p < .001). Better answers were given by doctors who knew the diagnostic criteria, had read books on psychiatry, and had attended previous courses.
More teaching on the diagnosis of schizophrenia and clinical psychopharmacology should be given to general practitioners.
本研究调查了意大利布雷西亚市基层医疗医生对精神分裂症的知识水平,以及与更充分信息相关的变量。
该研究设计是在与意大利全科医生学院的主要人物举行两次联席会议后制定的。对215名全科医生进行了横断面评估(2002年6月)。选取一个随机子组参加为期4个月的重新测试环节,以评估该量表的可靠性(2002年10月)。研究地点是布雷西亚当地的卫生单位,该单位有706名在该市及其省份工作的基层医疗医生。其中,30.5%参与了研究。为此项研究设计了一份结构化的自我报告问卷(SAKS)。还要求全科医生对5例患有不同DSM-IV诊断的患者的录像病例进行评分。主要结局指标是衡量精神分裂症症状和体征知识、抗精神病药物及其不良事件知识的子量表得分,以及对5例录像病例的正确诊断。
基层医疗医生识别出了精神分裂症的阳性症状(79.0%)、阴性症状(72.6%)和一般症状(72.1%)(p <.001)。在录像的5个病例中,他们平均正确评分3.1个病例。正确识别的抗精神病药物的平均百分比为34.1%(旧药)和51.2%(新药)(p <.001)。了解诊断标准、读过精神病学书籍并参加过先前课程的医生给出了更好的答案。
应给予全科医生更多关于精神分裂症诊断和临床精神药理学的教学。