Morris G P, Beck S A, Hanlon P, Robertson R
University of Strathclyde, Department of Civil Engineering, Glasgow, 107 Rottenrow, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK.
Public Health. 2006 Oct;120(10):889-903; discussion 903-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.022. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
Historically, the physical environment has been a target for public health policy across the globe. This remains the case in developing countries where the enduring infectious and toxic challenge posed by the environment is tangible and its health impact is manifest. However, in Western societies, the relevance of the environment to health has become obscured. Even when this is not the case, the perspective is usually narrow, centering on specific toxic, infectious or allergenic agents in particular environmental compartments. It is rare for importance to be given to a health-determining role for the environment acting through broader psychosocial mechanisms. The result is that environmental manipulation is seen as a cornerstone of the public health response for comparatively few health concerns. This paper considers how public health policies and action on the physical environment may be pursued more optimally. The need for a more strategic approach, which employs a new conceptual model that recognizes the complexity and contextual issues affecting the relationship between the environment and health but retains sufficient flexibility and simplicity to have practical application, is identified. Building on recent work, a model is proposed and pointers are given for its use in a practical context.
从历史上看,物理环境一直是全球公共卫生政策的目标。在发展中国家,情况依然如此,环境带来的持久的感染和毒性挑战是实实在在的,其对健康的影响也很明显。然而,在西方社会,环境与健康的相关性已变得模糊不清。即使并非如此,其观点通常也很狭隘,主要集中在特定环境区域中的特定有毒、感染性或致敏原物质。很少有人重视环境通过更广泛的社会心理机制发挥的健康决定作用。结果是,对于相对较少的健康问题,环境操纵被视为公共卫生应对措施的基石。本文探讨了如何能更优化地推行针对物理环境的公共卫生政策和行动。确定了采用一种新的概念模型的更具战略性的方法的必要性,该模型认识到影响环境与健康关系的复杂性和背景问题,但仍保持足够的灵活性和简单性以便实际应用。在近期工作的基础上,提出了一个模型,并给出了在实际环境中使用该模型的指导意见。