Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌患者想要自己选择放疗方案吗?

Do prostate cancer patients want to choose their own radiation treatment?

作者信息

van Tol-Geerdink Julia J, Stalmeier Peep F M, van Lin Emile N J T, Schimmel Erik C, Huizenga Henk, van Daal Wim A J, Leer Jan-Willem

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 15;66(4):1105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Sep 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to investigate whether prostate cancer patients want to be involved in the choice of the radiation dose, and which patients want to be involved.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective study involved 150 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. A decision aid was used to explain the effects of two alternative radiation doses (70 and 74 Gy) in terms of cure and side effects. Patients were then asked whether they wanted to choose their treatment (accept choice), or leave the decision to the physician (decline choice). The treatment preference was carried out.

RESULTS

Even in this older population (mean age, 70 years), most patients (79%) accepted the option to choose. A lower score on the designations Pre-existent bowel morbidity, Anxiety, Depression, Hopelessness and a higher score on Autonomy and Numeracy were associated with an increase in choice acceptance, of which only Hopelessness held up in multiple regression (p < 0.03). The uninformed participation preference at baseline was not significantly related to choice acceptance (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Uninformed participation preference does not predict choice behavior. However, once the decision aid is provided, most patients want to choose their treatment. It should, therefore, be considered to inform patients first and ask participation preferences afterwards.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查前列腺癌患者是否希望参与辐射剂量的选择,以及哪些患者希望参与。

方法与材料

这项前瞻性研究纳入了150例接受三维适形放疗的局限性前列腺癌患者。使用决策辅助工具从治愈效果和副作用方面解释两种替代辐射剂量(70和74 Gy)的影响。然后询问患者是希望自行选择治疗方案(接受选择),还是将决定权留给医生(拒绝选择)。进行了治疗偏好调查。

结果

即使在这个年龄较大的人群(平均年龄70岁)中,大多数患者(79%)接受了选择的选项。在“既往肠道疾病”“焦虑”“抑郁”“绝望”等指标上得分较低,以及在“自主性”和“数字运算能力”上得分较高,与选择接受度的增加相关,其中只有“绝望”在多元回归中仍然显著(p < 0.03)。基线时不知情的参与偏好与选择接受度无显著相关性(p = 0.10)。

结论

不知情的参与偏好并不能预测选择行为。然而,一旦提供了决策辅助工具,大多数患者希望自行选择治疗方案。因此,应考虑先告知患者,然后再询问参与偏好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验