Callaghan John J, Warth Lucian C, Liu Steve S, Hozack William J, Klein Gregg R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:97-101. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238819.33154.95.
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) options for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become increasingly popular. However, few controlled studies document their efficacy and safety. We examined the Internet for Knee Society members' websites to evaluate the level of promotion for these procedures in terms of direct (surgeon endorsed) and indirect (surgeon associated) information. On 92 websites, 22.7% made indirect reference to MIS TKA, while only 10.9% made a direct reference. Of the sites referencing MIS TKA, faster recovery was reported on 90% of indirect sites and 50% of direct sites. Specific risks were discussed on only 35% of indirect sites, and on only 20% of direct sites. CAOS TKA was discussed on 6.5% of indirect sites and on 5.4% of direct sites. Although MIS and CAOS TKA are frequently discussed on the Internet, only a small percentage of KS members directly promote these techniques (10.9% and 5.4%, respectively). Information was often indirectly associated with KS surgeons through institutional websites or hospital affiliations. Information indirectly associated with a surgeon may be mistaken as endorsing the procedure by a prospective patient.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)的微创手术(MIS)和计算机辅助骨科手术(CAOS)选择越来越受欢迎。然而,很少有对照研究记录它们的疗效和安全性。我们在互联网上搜索了膝关节协会成员的网站,以评估这些手术在直接(外科医生认可)和间接(与外科医生相关)信息方面的推广程度。在92个网站中,22.7%间接提及了MIS TKA,而直接提及的仅占10.9%。在提及MIS TKA的网站中,90%的间接网站和50%的直接网站报道了恢复更快。仅35%的间接网站和20%的直接网站讨论了具体风险。6.5%的间接网站和5.4%的直接网站讨论了CAOS TKA。尽管互联网上经常讨论MIS和CAOS TKA,但只有一小部分膝关节协会成员直接推广这些技术(分别为10.9%和5.4%)。信息通常通过机构网站或医院附属关系与膝关节协会外科医生间接相关。与外科医生间接相关的信息可能会被潜在患者误认为是对该手术的认可。