Kim Tae Kyun, Choi Jinbae, Shin Kwang Sook, Chang Chong Bum, Seong Sang Cheol
Joint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumidong, Bundangu, Seongnam-si, Gyunggido 463-707, South Korea.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Mar;16(3):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0468-8. Epub 2007 Dec 22.
We investigated the level of patient knowledge and preferences over the currently controversial issues in TKA. One hundred patients who had decided to undergo TKA for advanced osteoarthritis were asked to complete a questionnaire inquiring their knowledge and preferences over three controversial issues: (1) computer assisted surgery (CAS), (2) minimal invasive surgery (MIS), and (3) ceramic femoral component. The patient preferences over the three issues were questioned again after they had been informed of advantages and disadvantages of each option using an explanatory document. Most (more than 75%) of the patients did not have sufficient knowledge and their knowledge was based on non-professional sources (more than 85%). Before the information was given, most (more than 80%) of the patients preferred a new option. After the information was provided, more patients preferred a standard option in the issues of CAS (60%) and MIS (88%). This study prompts health care providers to become more active in providing accurate information and to consider patients perspective in making decisions which will influence the benefits and risk of the patients.
我们调查了患者对全膝关节置换术(TKA)当前争议性问题的了解程度和偏好。100名因重度骨关节炎而决定接受TKA手术的患者被要求填写一份问卷,询问他们对三个争议性问题的了解和偏好:(1)计算机辅助手术(CAS),(2)微创手术(MIS),以及(3)陶瓷股骨部件。在使用一份解释性文件向患者告知了每个选项的优缺点后,再次询问他们对这三个问题的偏好。大多数(超过75%)患者没有足够的了解,且他们的知识基于非专业来源(超过85%)。在给出信息之前,大多数(超过80%)患者偏好新选项。在提供信息之后,更多患者在CAS(60%)和MIS(88%)问题上偏好标准选项。本研究促使医疗保健提供者更积极地提供准确信息,并在做出会影响患者受益和风险的决策时考虑患者的观点。