Schülke Oliver, Chalise Mukesh K, Koenig Andreas
Junior Research Group, Integrative Primate Socio-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Am J Primatol. 2006 Oct;68(10):951-65. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20300.
Testing ecological or socioecological models in primatology often requires estimates of individual energy intake. It is a well established fact that the nutrient content (and hence the energy content) of primate food items is highly variable. The second variable in determining primate energy intake, i.e., the ingestion rate, has often been ignored, and few studies have attempted to estimate the relative importance of the two predictors. In the present study individual ingestion rates were measured in two ecologically very different populations of Hanuman langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) at Jodhpur, India, and Ramnagar, Nepal. Protein and soluble sugar concentrations in 50 and 100 food items. respectively, were measured using standardized methods. Variation in ingestion rates (gram of dry matter per minute) was markedly greater among food items than among langur individuals in both populations, but did not differ systematically among food item categories defined according to plant part and age. General linear models (GLMs) with ingestion rate, protein, and soluble sugar content explained 40-80% of the variation in energy intake rates (kJ/min). The relative importance of ingestion rates was either similar (Ramnagar) or much greater (Jodhpur) than the role of sugar and/or protein content in determining the energy intake rates of different items. These results may impact socioecological studies of variation in individual energy budgets, investigations of food choice in relation to chemical composition or sensory characteristics, and research into habitat preferences that measures habitat quality in terms of abundance of important food sources. We suggest a definition of food quality that includes not only the amount of valuable food contents (energy, vitamins, and minerals) and the digestibility of different foods, but also the rate at which the food can be harvested and processed. Such an extended definition seems necessary because time may constrain primates when feeding competition is intense and foraging is risk-prone.
在灵长类动物学中,检验生态或社会生态模型通常需要估算个体的能量摄入量。灵长类动物食物的营养成分(进而能量含量)高度可变,这是一个既定事实。决定灵长类动物能量摄入的第二个变量,即摄入率,常常被忽视,很少有研究尝试估算这两个预测因素的相对重要性。在本研究中,在印度焦特布尔和尼泊尔拉姆纳加尔的两个生态差异很大的哈努曼叶猴(食叶猴属)种群中测量了个体摄入率。分别使用标准化方法测量了50种和100种食物中的蛋白质和可溶性糖浓度。在这两个种群中,食物之间的摄入率(每分钟干物质克数)变化明显大于叶猴个体之间的变化,但在根据植物部位和年龄定义的食物类别之间没有系统差异。包含摄入率、蛋白质和可溶性糖含量的一般线性模型(GLMs)解释了能量摄入率(千焦/分钟)变化的40%-80%。在决定不同食物的能量摄入率方面,摄入率的相对重要性与糖和/或蛋白质含量的作用相似(拉姆纳加尔)或大得多(焦特布尔)。这些结果可能会影响个体能量预算变化的社会生态研究、与化学成分或感官特征相关的食物选择研究,以及根据重要食物来源的丰富程度衡量栖息地质量的栖息地偏好研究。我们建议对食物质量进行定义,不仅包括有价值食物成分(能量、维生素和矿物质)的数量以及不同食物的消化率,还包括食物的收获和加工速度。这样一个扩展定义似乎是必要的,因为在进食竞争激烈且觅食容易有风险时,时间可能会限制灵长类动物。