Murray Christopher J L, Kulkarni Sandeep C, Michaud Catherine, Tomijima Niels, Bulzacchelli Maria T, Iandiorio Terrell J, Ezzati Majid
Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2006 Sep;3(9):e260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030260.
The gap between the highest and lowest life expectancies for race-county combinations in the United States is over 35 y. We divided the race-county combinations of the US population into eight distinct groups, referred to as the "eight Americas," to explore the causes of the disparities that can inform specific public health intervention policies and programs.
The eight Americas were defined based on race, location of the county of residence, population density, race-specific county-level per capita income, and cumulative homicide rate. Data sources for population and mortality figures were the Bureau of the Census and the National Center for Health Statistics. We estimated life expectancy, the risk of mortality from specific diseases, health insurance, and health-care utilization for the eight Americas. The life expectancy gap between the 3.4 million high-risk urban black males and the 5.6 million Asian females was 20.7 y in 2001. Within the sexes, the life expectancy gap between the best-off and the worst-off groups was 15.4 y for males (Asians versus high-risk urban blacks) and 12.8 y for females (Asians versus low-income southern rural blacks). Mortality disparities among the eight Americas were largest for young (15-44 y) and middle-aged (45-59 y) adults, especially for men. The disparities were caused primarily by a number of chronic diseases and injuries with well-established risk factors. Between 1982 and 2001, the ordering of life expectancy among the eight Americas and the absolute difference between the advantaged and disadvantaged groups remained largely unchanged. Self-reported health plan coverage was lowest for western Native Americans and low-income southern rural blacks. Crude self-reported health-care utilization, however, was slightly higher for the more disadvantaged populations.
Disparities in mortality across the eight Americas, each consisting of millions or tens of millions of Americans, are enormous by all international standards. The observed disparities in life expectancy cannot be explained by race, income, or basic health-care access and utilization alone. Because policies aimed at reducing fundamental socioeconomic inequalities are currently practically absent in the US, health disparities will have to be at least partly addressed through public health strategies that reduce risk factors for chronic diseases and injuries.
在美国,按种族 - 县组合划分的最高与最低预期寿命之间的差距超过35岁。我们将美国人口的种族 - 县组合分为八个不同的群体,即“八个美国群体”,以探究这些差异的成因,从而为具体的公共卫生干预政策和项目提供依据。
“八个美国群体”是根据种族、居住县的位置、人口密度、特定种族的县级人均收入以及累积凶杀率来定义的。人口和死亡率数据的来源是人口普查局和国家卫生统计中心。我们估算了“八个美国群体”的预期寿命、特定疾病的死亡风险、医疗保险以及医疗保健利用率。2001年,340万高危城市黑人男性与560万亚洲女性之间的预期寿命差距为20.7岁。在性别内部,最富裕群体与最贫困群体之间的预期寿命差距,男性为15.4岁(亚洲人与高危城市黑人相比),女性为12.8岁(亚洲人与低收入南方农村黑人相比)。“八个美国群体”之间的死亡率差异在年轻(15 - 44岁)和中年(45 - 59岁)成年人中最为显著,尤其是男性。这些差异主要由一些具有公认风险因素的慢性疾病和伤害导致。1982年至2001年期间,“八个美国群体”的预期寿命排序以及优势群体与弱势群体之间的绝对差异基本保持不变。自我报告的健康计划覆盖率在西部美洲原住民和低收入南方农村黑人中最低。然而,粗略的自我报告医疗保健利用率在处境更为不利的人群中略高。
按照所有国际标准,由数百万或数千万美国人组成的“八个美国群体”之间的死亡率差异极大。观察到的预期寿命差异不能仅由种族、收入或基本医疗保健的可及性和利用率来解释。由于美国目前实际上缺乏旨在减少基本社会经济不平等的政策,健康差异至少部分必须通过降低慢性疾病和伤害风险因素的公共卫生策略来解决。