Szalay K, Antal I, Kiss J, Szendroi M
Orthopaedic Clinic of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Int Orthop. 2006 Dec;30(6):505-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0190-z. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare and assess the effect of bone grafting and cementing techniques--two common applications used in the treatment of subchondral giant cell tumours of bone (GCTs)--on the development of degenerative changes in the weight-bearing joints of the lower extremity. Eighty patients were included in this follow-up study, 44 of whom underwent curettage followed by bone grafting, and 36 who had curettage followed by cementation. At the 24-month post-operative examination, significantly less degenerative change was found in patients with bone cement than in those with bone grafting. At the 50-month and later (range: 50-148 months) post-operative examination, however, no significant differences were found between the two groups, indicating that there was a significant acceleration of degenerative changes in the cemented group after the 24-month follow-up.
这项回顾性研究的目的是比较和评估骨移植和骨水泥技术(治疗骨软骨下巨细胞瘤(GCT)的两种常见应用)对下肢负重关节退变的影响。80名患者纳入了这项随访研究,其中44例行刮除术加骨移植,36例行刮除术加骨水泥填充。术后24个月检查发现,骨水泥填充患者的退变改变明显少于骨移植患者。然而,在术后50个月及以后(范围:50-148个月)的检查中,两组之间未发现显著差异,这表明在24个月随访后,骨水泥填充组的退变改变有显著加速。