Suppr超能文献

美国公共卫生学院/传统烟草使用预防奖学金、培训与教育项目(STEP UP)战略规划会议建议,芝加哥,2005年5月3日。

Recommendations from the ASPH/Legacy Scholarship, Training, and Education Program for Tobacco Use Prevention (STEP UP) strategy planning meeting Chicago, May 3, 2005.

作者信息

Sheffer Christine, Green Lawrence, Ramiah Kalpana, Raczynski James

机构信息

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct;121(5):629-33. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100521.

Abstract

During this meeting, the participants developed a strategic set of recommendations for ASPH to continue to advance the study of tobacco control in public health through research and education/training programs. The meeting focused on sustaining and further developing tobacco-related research and education/ training programs. All four issues were addressed in depth through valuable discussion and exchange and reflected in the nine areas of focus. Recommendations for advocacy for future funding for SPH in tobacco control included developing collaborative relationships with ASPH partners, organizations, and institutions with complementary objectives (state departments of health, third party payors, etc). Priorities for sustaining and further developing research and education/training programs within SPH included developing a focus on particular research areas (e.g., special populations, economic issues, dissemination and translational issues), building on existing knowledge, and attempting to avoid the effects of "siloing" with collaborative relationships and methods for addressing the sustenance of programs beyond initial funding periods. Methods to maintain vigilance on tobacco control with increasing concerns about other risk factors included fostering an increasing awareness of tobacco-related issues, projects, and programs as well as developing collaborative relationships with organizations and institutions with complementary health-risk related objectives. Other recommendations focused on enhancing SPH leadership in the tobacco control field by developing standards and methodologies and translating research to practice. They included (1) developing standards for consistent tobacco control-related education to public health students, public health professionals, and other students and professionals; (2) developing a standardized method for evaluating tobacco-attributable factors and effects; and (3) conducting effectiveness trials of treatments known to be efficacious. Effectively addressing these perennial issues will enable SPH to enhance its leadership position and contribute greatly to research and education/training in tobacco control. All of these issues were factors in program planning for the second National STEP UP Academic Tobacco Workshop. For instance, reviews of particular research areas might be offered or facilitated as well as methods for developing collaborative partnerships and subsequent efforts. Steps toward the development of tobacco control education core competencies might be developed as well. The second National STEP UP Academic Tobacco Workshop-STEP UP to Sustain Tobacco Control and Prevention through Education and Research--was held on January 30-31, 2006. The topics of discussion ranged from use of secondary data to behavioral economics. More information about the workshop can be found at http://www.asph.org/ document.cfm?page=882. Attention to the recommendations that resulted from the planning meeting will provide a strategic platform from which ASPH and the public health community can continue to address the single greatest cause of preventable disease and death in the world.

摘要

在本次会议期间,与会者为美国公共卫生学院协会(ASPH)制定了一系列战略建议,以便通过研究及教育/培训项目继续推进公共卫生领域的烟草控制研究。会议重点关注维持并进一步发展与烟草相关的研究及教育/培训项目。通过富有价值的讨论与交流,深入探讨了所有四个问题,并反映在九个重点领域中。关于为公共卫生学院在烟草控制方面争取未来资金支持的倡导建议包括,与目标互补的ASPH合作伙伴、组织和机构(州卫生部门、第三方支付机构等)建立合作关系。在公共卫生学院内部维持并进一步发展研究及教育/培训项目的优先事项包括,专注于特定研究领域(如特殊人群、经济问题、传播与转化问题),基于现有知识,并尝试通过合作关系以及解决初始资助期之后项目维持问题的方法来避免“各自为政”的影响。随着对其他风险因素的担忧加剧,保持对烟草控制警惕的方法包括,提高对烟草相关问题、项目和计划的认识,以及与目标互补的健康风险相关组织和机构建立合作关系。其他建议聚焦于通过制定标准和方法以及将研究转化为实践,来加强公共卫生学院在烟草控制领域的领导力。这些建议包括:(1)为公共卫生专业学生、公共卫生专业人员以及其他学生和专业人员制定与烟草控制相关的一致教育标准;(2)制定评估烟草归因因素和影响的标准化方法;(3)对已知有效的治疗方法进行有效性试验。有效解决这些长期存在的问题将使公共卫生学院能够提升其领导地位,并为烟草控制研究及教育/培训做出巨大贡献。所有这些问题都是第二届全国烟草学术提升研讨会项目规划中的因素。例如,可以提供或推动对特定研究领域的审查,以及建立合作伙伴关系的方法和后续工作。还可以制定发展烟草控制教育核心能力的步骤。第二届全国烟草学术提升研讨会——通过教育和研究加强烟草控制与预防——于2006年1月30日至31日举行。讨论的主题涵盖从二手数据的使用到行为经济学等内容。有关该研讨会的更多信息可在http://www.asph.org/document.cfm?page=882上找到。关注规划会议产生的建议将提供一个战略平台,美国公共卫生学院协会和公共卫生界可以借此继续应对世界上可预防疾病和死亡的最大单一原因。

相似文献

2
The UCLA tobacco control program.
Public Health Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct;121(5):515-20. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100506.
3
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
5
Crosswalking public health and health education competencies: implications for professional preparation and practice.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):E20-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181b3a3d2.
8
[Current issues related to education in the five core disciplines of public health at the school of public health in a private university].
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2023 Sep 30;70(9):544-553. doi: 10.11236/jph.23-007. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
9
Reducing the gap between the economic costs of tobacco and funds for tobacco training in schools of public health.
Public Health Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct;121(5):538-46. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100509.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultivating the next generation of tobacco endgame advocates.
Tob Control. 2013 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i47-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050810.

本文引用的文献

1
The genetic determinants of smoking.
Chest. 2003 May;123(5):1730-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5.1730.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验