Hartel Paul H, Jackson Jeffrey, Ducatman Barbara S, Zhang Peilin
Department of Pathology, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
J Cutan Pathol. 2006 Sep;33 Suppl 2:24-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2006.00492.x.
Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX), a benign lesion, and pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) are thought to represent points along the same neoplastic spectrum but with different prognoses and treatments. Diagnosis based on histology and clinical parameters alone is sometimes difficult, and a reliable cost-effective immunohistochemical marker to help distinguish these lesions would be beneficial. The diagnosis of AFX or MFH was based upon published clinical and microscopic criteria. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of 17 cases of AFX and 26 cases of MFH were immunostained with monoclonal antibody to CD99. For all cases, CD99 expression was scored on a four-tiered scale: negative, weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+). Two pathologists blinded to tumor diagnoses and type of immunostain evaluated each case independently. The interobserver correlation coefficient was calculated. Seventeen patients with AFX (16 males and one female; mean age = 79) and 26 patients with MFH (16 males and 10 females; mean age = 60) were included. AFX lesions were from the head and the face, mean size = 1.5 cm, and MFH lesions were from the head, the neck, the trunk, and the upper/lower extremities, mean size = 5.2 cm. The 17 cases of AFX demonstrated moderate or strong (2 to 3+) immunoreactivity with CD99, compared to nine of 26 (35%) MFH cases (chi-square = 18.38; p < 0.001; interobserver correlation coefficient = 0.83). Of these, 16 of 17 (94%) AFX cases stained diffusely with CD99, while only four of 26 (15%) MFH cases stained diffusely. Control slides were adequate. Our study demonstrated that CD99 can help distinguish AFX from MFH, in addition to other immunohistochemistry as well as clinical and histologic criteria.
非典型纤维黄色瘤(AFX)是一种良性病变,与多形性恶性纤维组织细胞瘤(MFH)被认为代表同一肿瘤谱系上的不同点,但预后和治疗方法各异。仅基于组织学和临床参数进行诊断有时很困难,因此一种可靠且经济高效的免疫组化标志物有助于区分这些病变,将大有裨益。AFX或MFH的诊断依据已发表的临床和显微镜标准。对17例AFX和26例MFH的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织用抗CD99单克隆抗体进行免疫染色。对于所有病例,CD99表达按四级评分:阴性、弱阳性(1+)、中度阳性(2+)或强阳性(3+)。两名对肿瘤诊断和免疫染色类型不知情的病理学家独立评估每个病例。计算观察者间相关系数。纳入17例AFX患者(16例男性和1例女性;平均年龄 = 79岁)和26例MFH患者(16例男性和10例女性;平均年龄 = 60岁)。AFX病变位于头面部,平均大小 = 1.5 cm,MFH病变位于头、颈、躯干及上肢/下肢,平均大小 = 5.2 cm。17例AFX中有16例(94%)CD99弥漫性染色,而26例MFH中仅4例(15%)CD99弥漫性染色;17例AFX表现为CD99中度或强阳性(2至3+),相比之下,26例MFH中有9例(35%)如此(卡方 = 18.38;p < 0.001;观察者间相关系数 = 0.83)。对照切片质量合格。我们的研究表明,除其他免疫组化以及临床和组织学标准外,CD99有助于区分AFX和MFH。