Blanchard Edward B, Lackner Jeffrey M, Sanders Kathryn, Krasner Susan, Keefer Laurie, Payne Annette, Gudleski Gregory D, Katz Leonard, Rowell Dianna, Sykes Mark, Kuhn Eric, Gusmano Rebecca, Carosella Ann Marie, Firth Rebecca, Dulgar-Tulloch Lisa
Center for Stress and Anxiety Disorders, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):633-48. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
We randomized, at two sites, 210 patients with Rome II diagnosed irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), of at least moderate severity, to one of three conditions: group-based cognitive therapy (CT; n=120), psychoeducational support groups (n=46) as an active control, or intensive symptom and daily stress monitoring (n=44). One hundred eighty-eight participants completed the initial treatment. Those in symptom monitoring were then crossed over to CT. For an intent to treat analysis on a composite GI symptom measure derived from daily symptom diaries, both CT and the psychoeducational support groups were significantly more improved than those in the intensive symptom monitoring condition, but the CT and psychoeducational support group did not differ. Among treatment completers on the same composite measure of GI symptoms, again, both CT and psychoeducational support groups were statistically superior to symptom monitoring but did not differ on the symptom composite, or on any other measure. On individual IBS symptoms, both CT and psychoeducational support were statistically superior to symptom monitoring on reductions in abdominal pain and tenderness and for flatulence. Patient global ratings at the end of treatment showed the two active conditions statistically superior to symptom monitoring on change in Bowel Regularity, with CT superior to symptom monitoring on reduction in overall pain and in improvement in sense of well-being. Three-month follow-up data on 175 patients revealed maintenance of significant improvement or continued significant improvement on all IBS symptoms, including the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Group CT and psychoeducational support groups continued not to differ on any measure. We thus conclude that group CT is not superior to an attention placebo control condition.
我们在两个地点将210名被诊断为罗马II型肠易激综合征(IBS)且病情至少为中度严重程度的患者随机分为三种情况之一:基于小组的认知疗法(CT;n = 120)、作为积极对照的心理教育支持小组(n = 46)或强化症状及日常压力监测(n = 44)。188名参与者完成了初始治疗。症状监测组的患者随后转而接受CT治疗。对于基于每日症状日记得出的综合胃肠道症状测量指标进行意向性治疗分析时,CT组和心理教育支持小组在改善程度上均显著优于强化症状监测组,但CT组和心理教育支持小组之间并无差异。在针对相同的胃肠道症状综合测量指标的治疗完成者中,同样,CT组和心理教育支持小组在统计学上均优于症状监测组,但在症状综合指标或任何其他测量指标上并无差异。在个体IBS症状方面,CT组和心理教育支持小组在减轻腹痛、压痛及肠胃胀气方面在统计学上均优于症状监测组。治疗结束时患者的总体评价显示,两种积极治疗情况在肠道规律性变化方面在统计学上优于症状监测组,CT组在减轻总体疼痛及改善幸福感方面优于症状监测组。对175名患者的三个月随访数据显示,所有IBS症状,包括麦吉尔疼痛问卷所涉及的症状,均维持显著改善或持续显著改善。小组CT组和心理教育支持小组在任何测量指标上仍无差异。因此,我们得出结论,小组CT并不优于注意力安慰剂对照情况。