• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荟萃分析中研究间的极端同质性可能会提供有用的见解。

Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights.

作者信息

Ioannidis John P A, Trikalinos Thomas A, Zintzaras Elias

机构信息

Clinical Trials and Evidence-based Medicine Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina 45110, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1023-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.013
PMID:16980141
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Meta-analyses are routinely evaluated for the presence of large between-study heterogeneity. We examined whether it is also important to probe whether there is extreme between-study homogeneity.

STUDY DESIGN

We used heterogeneity tests with left-sided statistical significance for inference and developed a Monte Carlo simulation test for testing extreme homogeneity in risk ratios across studies, using the empiric distribution of the summary risk ratio and heterogeneity statistic. A left-sided P=0.01 threshold was set for claiming extreme homogeneity to minimize type I error.

RESULTS

Among 11,803 meta-analyses with binary contrasts from the Cochrane Library, 143 (1.21%) had left-sided P-value <0.01 for the asymptotic Q statistic and 1,004 (8.50%) had left-sided P-value <0.10. The frequency of extreme between-study homogeneity did not depend on the number of studies in the meta-analyses. We identified examples where extreme between-study homogeneity (left-sided P-value <0.01) could result from various possibilities beyond chance. These included inappropriate statistical inference (asymptotic vs. Monte Carlo), use of a specific effect metric, correlated data or stratification using strong predictors of outcome, and biases and potential fraud.

CONCLUSION

Extreme between-study homogeneity may provide useful insights about a meta-analysis and its constituent studies.

摘要

目的

系统评价通常会针对研究间的巨大异质性进行评估。我们研究了探究研究间是否存在极端同质性是否也很重要。

研究设计

我们使用具有左侧统计显著性的异质性检验进行推断,并使用汇总风险比和异质性统计量的经验分布,开发了一种蒙特卡罗模拟检验,用于检验各研究风险比的极端同质性。设定左侧P = 0.01的阈值来判定极端同质性,以尽量减少I型错误。

结果

在Cochrane图书馆中11803项采用二元对比的系统评价中,143项(1.21%)的渐近Q统计量左侧P值<0.01,1004项(8.50%)的左侧P值<0.10。研究间极端同质性的频率并不取决于系统评价中的研究数量。我们发现了一些例子,其中研究间的极端同质性(左侧P值<0.01)可能是由多种非偶然因素导致的。这些因素包括不恰当的统计推断(渐近法与蒙特卡罗法)、使用特定的效应指标、相关数据或使用结果的强预测因子进行分层,以及偏倚和潜在欺诈。

结论

研究间的极端同质性可能会为系统评价及其组成研究提供有用的见解。

相似文献

1
Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights.荟萃分析中研究间的极端同质性可能会提供有用的见解。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1023-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
2
HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.HELOW:一种用于在荟萃分析中检验极端同质性的程序。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Nov;117(2):383-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
3
Quality of reporting of cancer prognostic marker studies: association with reported prognostic effect.癌症预后标志物研究的报告质量:与所报告的预后效果的关联
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 7;99(3):236-43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk032.
4
The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.荟萃分析中用于发表偏倚的不对称性检验的适用性:一项大型调查。
CMAJ. 2007 Apr 10;176(8):1091-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060410.
5
Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.明显结论性的荟萃分析可能并非结论性的——在明显结论性的新生儿荟萃分析中,对累积数据进行重复测试导致随机误差风险的试验序贯分析调整。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;38(1):287-98. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn188. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
6
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?评估荟萃分析中的异质性:Q统计量还是I²指数?
Psychol Methods. 2006 Jun;11(2):193-206. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193.
7
Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?试验序贯监测界限能否减少荟萃分析中的虚假推断?
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;38(1):276-86. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn179. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
8
Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference.荟萃分析中的同质性检验I. 单参数情形:标准化均数差
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):203-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01442.x.
9
How should we use information about HWE in the meta-analyses of genetic association studies?在基因关联研究的荟萃分析中,我们应如何使用有关哈迪-温伯格平衡(HWE)的信息?
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;37(1):136-46. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym234. Epub 2007 Nov 23.
10
Test homogeneity of odds ratio in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.在存在不依从性的随机临床试验中检验比值比的同质性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2009 Sep;19(5):916-32. doi: 10.1080/10543400903105497.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian hypothesis testing and estimation under the marginalized random-effects meta-analysis model.边缘随机效应荟萃分析模型下的贝叶斯假设检验和估计。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):55-69. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01918-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis.元分析中的发表偏倚检验:一项元元分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215052. eCollection 2019.
3
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
基于p值进行Meta分析:关于应用p值一致性分析和p曲线的保留意见与建议
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):713-729. doi: 10.1177/1745691616650874.
4
Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review.重症医学中的伦理出版:一篇叙述性综述。
World J Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug 4;5(3):171-9. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i3.171.
5
Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?使用广义异质性统计量的随机效应荟萃分析中研究间方差的置信区间:我们应该使用不等尾吗?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0219-y.
6
Citrus Fruit Intake Substantially Reduces the Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies.柑橘类水果摄入量可大幅降低食管癌风险:一项流行病学研究的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1390. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001390.
7
Beautiful small: Misleading large randomized controlled trials? The example of colloids for volume resuscitation.美好却微小:误导性的大型随机对照试验?以胶体用于容量复苏为例
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul-Sep;31(3):394-400. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.161680.
8
The effects of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for adult surgical patients.围手术期高吸入氧分数对成年外科手术患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 25;2015(6):CD008884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008884.pub2.
9
Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of cancer in adults.成人补充维生素D预防癌症
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 23;2014(6):CD007469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007469.pub2.
10
Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults.补充维生素D预防成年人死亡
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 10;2014(1):CD007470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007470.pub3.