• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单疗程延长酒精保留硬化疗法治疗大型肝囊肿

Single-session prolonged alcohol-retention sclerotherapy for large hepatic cysts.

作者信息

Yang Chien-Fang, Liang Huei-Lung, Pan Huay-Ben, Lin Yih-Huie, Mok King-Tong, Lo Gin-Ho, Lai Kwok-Hung

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung 1st Rd., Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):940-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0621.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0621
PMID:16985138
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of single-session prolonged alcohol sclerotherapy in treating large hepatic cysts. A therapeutic comparison between 4-hour and 2-hour retention techniques was also studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with 31 hepatic cysts were enrolled in this study. Seventeen patients (18 cysts) were treated by alcohol retention for 4 hours (group 1) and 10 patients (13 cysts) for 2 hours (group 2). The mean diameter of the hepatic cysts was 12.4 cm (range, 8-23 cm) with a comparable size range in each group. The sclerosing agent used was 95% alcohol, and the maximum amount was limited to 200 mL. Patients changed position and vital signs were monitored every 10-15 minutes. The blood alcohol concentrations were checked hourly for 5 consecutive hours in the initial nine patients. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference in characteristics and treatment results of the subjects between these two groups. The level of statistical significance was set at a p value of less than 0.05.

RESULTS

All but one patient in group 2 tolerated the entire course of sclerotherapy. The mean aspirated volume and mean injected alcohol volume of the hepatic cysts were 730 mL and 138.3 mL, respectively, in group 1 patients, and 931 mL and 139 mL, respectively, in group 2 patients. The mean maximum blood alcohol concentration was 128.2 mg/dL (range, 60-199 mg/dL) at 3-4 hours after alcohol instillation. The mean posttherapy residual cystic diameter was 2.5 cm (range, 0-6 cm), with an average volume reduction rate of 98.3% and 97.7%, respectively, for patients in group 1 and group 2 after a mean follow-up period of 29.6 months (9-59 months). No statistical differences of the mean reduction rate between the two groups were noted.

CONCLUSION

Long retention of the alcohol in a single-injection technique is safe and effective. Two-hour alcohol retention has a comparable efficacy to that of 4-hour retention.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是评估单次长时间酒精硬化疗法治疗大型肝囊肿的安全性和治疗效果。同时还研究了4小时和2小时保留技术之间的治疗效果比较。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了27例患有31个肝囊肿的患者。17例患者(18个囊肿)接受了4小时的酒精保留治疗(第1组),10例患者(13个囊肿)接受了2小时的酒精保留治疗(第2组)。肝囊肿的平均直径为12.4厘米(范围8 - 23厘米),两组囊肿大小范围相当。使用的硬化剂为95%酒精,最大用量限制为200毫升。患者每10 - 15分钟更换一次体位,并监测生命体征。最初的9例患者连续5小时每小时检查一次血液酒精浓度。采用非参数曼 - 惠特尼U检验比较两组受试者的特征和治疗结果差异。统计学显著性水平设定为p值小于0.05。

结果

第2组除1例患者外,其余患者均耐受了整个硬化治疗过程。第1组患者肝囊肿的平均抽出液量和平均注入酒精量分别为730毫升和138.3毫升,第2组患者分别为931毫升和139毫升。酒精注入后3 - 4小时的平均最大血液酒精浓度为128.2毫克/分升(范围60 - 199毫克/分升)。平均随访29.6个月(9 - 59个月)后,第1组和第2组患者治疗后囊肿残余平均直径为2.5厘米(范围0 - 6厘米),平均体积缩小率分别为98.3%和97.7%。两组之间平均缩小率无统计学差异。

结论

单次注射技术中长时间保留酒精是安全有效的。2小时酒精保留与4小时保留的疗效相当。

相似文献

1
Single-session prolonged alcohol-retention sclerotherapy for large hepatic cysts.单疗程延长酒精保留硬化疗法治疗大型肝囊肿
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):940-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0621.
2
Single-session alcohol-retention sclerotherapy for simple renal cysts: comparison of 2- and 4-hr retention techniques.单疗程酒精保留硬化疗法治疗单纯性肾囊肿:2小时和4小时保留技术的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):860-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1219.
3
Sclerotherapy of simple hepatic cysts by repeated aspiration and alcohol instillation.通过反复抽吸和注入酒精对单纯性肝囊肿进行硬化治疗。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;23(4):359-65. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0349.
4
Effectiveness of CT-guided sclerotherapy with estimated ethanol concentration for treatment of symptomatic simple hepatic cysts.CT 引导下硬化治疗估计乙醇浓度治疗症状性单纯性肝囊肿的疗效。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;38(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
5
Efficacy of single-session percutaneous drainage and 50% acetic Acid sclerotherapy for treatment of simple renal cysts.单次经皮引流联合50%醋酸硬化疗法治疗单纯性肾囊肿的疗效
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;30(6):1227-33. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9176-5. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
6
Symptomatic simple renal cyst: comparison of continuous negative-pressure catheter drainage and single-session alcohol sclerotherapy.症状性单纯肾囊肿:持续负压导管引流与单次酒精硬化疗法的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1193-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2867.
7
Aspiration and sclerotherapy of symptomatic simple renal cysts: value of two injections of a sclerosing agent.有症状单纯性肾囊肿的抽吸与硬化治疗:两次注射硬化剂的价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Sep;167(3):781-3. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751700.
8
Long-term follow-up of large symptomatic hepatic cysts treated by percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy.经皮乙醇硬化疗法治疗有症状的大型肝囊肿的长期随访
Acta Radiol. 2016 Oct;57(10):1205-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185115626476. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Curative effect of lauromacrogol and absolute ethyl alcohol injection guided by ultrasound on simplex hepatic cyst.超声引导下聚桂醇与无水乙醇注射治疗单纯性肝囊肿的疗效
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015 Mar;28(2 Suppl):697-700.
10
Acetic acid as a sclerosing agent for renal cysts: comparison with ethanol in follow-up results.乙酸作为肾囊肿硬化剂:随访结果与乙醇的比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):177-81. doi: 10.1007/s002700010039.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol vs ethanol combined with paclitaxel for the ablation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导下乙醇消融与乙醇联合紫杉醇消融胰腺囊性病变的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03905-z.
2
Complete and Incomplete Alcohol Sclerotherapy for Treatment of Symptomatic Hepatic Cysts: Comparison of Volume Reduction and Clinical Outcomes.用于治疗有症状肝囊肿的完全性和不完全性酒精硬化疗法:体积缩小及临床结果比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 3;13(5):1472. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051472.
3
Successful minimally invasive simple hepatic cyst ablation via ethanol sclerotherapy in a cat.
通过乙醇硬化疗法成功对猫进行微创单纯肝囊肿消融术。
JFMS Open Rep. 2023 Dec 18;9(2):20551169231215273. doi: 10.1177/20551169231215273. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
4
Percutaneous aspiration and sclerotherapy of a giant simple hepatic cyst causing obstructive jaundice: A case report and review of literature.经皮穿刺抽吸及硬化治疗致梗阻性黄疸的巨大单纯性肝囊肿:病例报告及文献复习
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul 27;14(7):706-713. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i7.706.
5
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session OK-432 and Multiple-Session 99% Ethanol Sclerotherapy for Symptomatic Simple Hepatic Cysts.单次注射溶链菌制剂与多次注射99%乙醇硬化疗法治疗有症状单纯性肝囊肿的疗效及安全性比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 15;9:737694. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.737694. eCollection 2022.
6
Ethanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy for symptomatic hepatic cysts.乙醇硬化疗法或聚多卡醇硬化疗法治疗有症状的肝囊肿。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jul;6(6):919-925. doi: 10.1177/2050640618764940. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Differentiating Cystic Liver Lesions: A Review of Imaging Modalities, Diagnosis and Management.鉴别肝脏囊性病变:影像学检查方法、诊断与管理综述
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018 Jun 28;6(2):208-216. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00069. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
Experimental intraperitoneal injection of alcohol in rats: Peritoneal findings and histopathology.大鼠腹腔内注射酒精的实验:腹膜检查结果与组织病理学
Toxicol Rep. 2014 Mar 28;1:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.03.001. eCollection 2014.
9
Predictors of treatment response following aspiration sclerotherapy of hepatic cysts: an international pooled analysis of individual patient data.肝囊肿穿刺硬化治疗后治疗反应的预测因素:个体患者数据的国际汇总分析
Eur Radiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):741-748. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4363-x. Epub 2016 May 14.
10
Single-session alcohol sclerotherapy of symptomatic liver cysts using 10-20 min of ethanol exposure: no recurrence at 2-16 years of follow-up.单次酒精硬化治疗症状性肝囊肿:10-20 分钟乙醇暴露,2-16 年随访无复发。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Sep;41(9):1776-81. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0769-9.