• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典单侧唇腭裂患者牙弓关系分析:采用延迟硬腭关闭治疗的20年纵向连续病例系列

Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure.

作者信息

Lilja Jan, Mars Michael, Elander Anna, Enocson Lars, Hagberg Catharina, Worrell Emma, Batra Puneet, Friede Hans

机构信息

Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):606-11. doi: 10.1597/05-069.

DOI:10.1597/05-069
PMID:16986983
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dental arch relationships for a consecutive series from Goteborg, Sweden, who had delayed hard palate closure.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.

PATIENTS

The dental study models of 104 consecutive unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects. The study cohort was born between 1979 and 1994. Longitudinal records were available at ages 5 (n = 94), 10 (n = 97), 16 (n = 59), and 19 years (n = 46). Five assessors rated models according to the GOSLON Yardstick on two separate occasions each.

INTERVENTIONS

These patients had been operated upon according to the Goteborg protocol of delayed hard palate closure (at age 8 years).

RESULTS

85% of subjects were rated in groups 1 and 2 (excellent or very good outcome), 12% were rated in group 3 (satisfactory), and 3% were assigned to group 4 (poor). No patients presented in Group 5 (very poor). Weighted kappa statistics for double determination of Yardstick allocation for five assessors demonstrated values between .65 and .90 for interrater agreement (good/very good) and between .70 and .90 for intrarater agreement (very good).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed hard palate closure as practiced in Goteborg since 1979 has produced the best GOSLON Yardstick ratings in a consecutive series of patients ever recorded worldwide, since the Yardstick was first used in 1983. However, it is noteworthy that a new protocol has been introduced in Goteborg since 1994, in which hard palate closure is done at 3 years due to concerns regarding speech.

摘要

目的

评估瑞典哥德堡一系列连续的硬腭闭合延迟患者的牙弓关系。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

瑞典哥德堡萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院。

患者

104例连续的单侧唇腭裂患者的牙齿研究模型。研究队列出生于1979年至1994年之间。可获得5岁(n = 94)、10岁(n = 97)、16岁(n = 59)和19岁(n = 46)时的纵向记录。五名评估者分别在两个不同时间根据戈斯隆标尺对模型进行评分。

干预措施

这些患者已按照哥德堡延迟硬腭闭合方案(8岁时)进行了手术。

结果

85%的受试者被评为1组和2组(结果优秀或非常好),12%被评为3组(满意),3%被分配到4组(差)。没有患者属于5组(非常差)。五名评估者对标尺分配进行双重测定的加权kappa统计显示,评分者间一致性的值在0.65至0.90之间(良好/非常好),评分者内一致性的值在0.70至0.90之间(非常好)。

结论

自1979年以来在哥德堡实施的延迟硬腭闭合在全球有记录的连续一系列患者中产生了有史以来最好的戈斯隆标尺评分,自1983年该标尺首次使用以来。然而,值得注意的是,自1994年以来哥德堡引入了一种新方案,由于对语音的担忧,硬腭闭合在3岁时进行。

相似文献

1
Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure.瑞典单侧唇腭裂患者牙弓关系分析:采用延迟硬腭关闭治疗的20年纵向连续病例系列
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):606-11. doi: 10.1597/05-069.
2
One- or two-stage palate closure in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: comparing cephalometric and occlusal outcomes.单侧唇腭裂患者一期或二期腭裂修复术:头影测量和咬合结果比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Jan;44(1):13-22. doi: 10.1597/05-160.
3
Intraoral photographs for rating dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate.用于评估单侧唇腭裂患者牙弓关系的口腔内照片。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Jul;46(4):415-9. doi: 10.1597/07-220.1. Epub 2009 Feb 1.
4
Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays in closure of the hard palate after early velar repair.早期腭裂修复术后不同延迟关闭硬腭治疗的单侧唇腭裂患者的上颌牙弓与咬合情况
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(5):261-6. doi: 10.1080/02844310600973605.
5
The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationships.欧洲腭裂研究:唇腭裂患者治疗结果的多中心研究。第3部分:牙弓关系。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jan;42(1):78-82. doi: 10.1597/02-119.3.1.
6
Palate morphology after unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate closure.单侧和双侧唇腭裂修复术后的腭部形态
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;35(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.06.007. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
7
Timing of hard palate closure and dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a mixed-longitudinal study.单侧唇腭裂患者硬腭闭合时间与牙弓关系:一项混合纵向研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993 Jul;30(4):391-6. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0391_tohpca_2.3.co_2.
8
Complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: validity of the five-year index and the Goslon yardstick in predicting long-term dental arch relationships.完全性单侧唇腭裂:五年指数和戈斯隆标准在预测长期牙弓关系中的有效性。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):557-62. doi: 10.1597/05-074.
9
Quality improvement of cleft lip and palate treatment.唇腭裂治疗的质量改进
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):265-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0265:QIOCLA]2.0.CO;2.
10
Anterior crossbite, dental arch dimensions, and later need for orthognathic surgery in 6-year-old children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂6岁儿童的前牙反合、牙弓尺寸及后期正颌手术需求
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Sep;51(5):579-84. doi: 10.1597/12-198. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Dental Arch Relationship and Palatal Morphology after Cleft Surgery in Italian Children with Unilateral Cleft and Lip Palate.意大利单侧唇腭裂患儿腭裂修复术后牙弓关系及腭部形态的横断面研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;10(9):1559. doi: 10.3390/children10091559.
2
Long-term Outcome for Two-Stage Palatal Closure With Different Timings for Hard Palate Surgery: Craniofacial Growth and Dental Arch Relation.硬腭裂分阶段手术不同时机对腭部闭合的长期效果:颅面生长和牙弓关系。
3
The Assessment of 3D Digital Models Using GOSLON Yardstick Index: Exploring Confounding Factors Responsible for Unfavourable Treatment Outcome in Multi-Population Children With UCLP.
使用戈斯隆量表指数评估三维数字模型:探究影响患有单侧完全性唇腭裂的多群体儿童治疗结果不佳的混杂因素。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 28;9:646830. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.646830. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessment of dental arch stability after orthodontic treatment and oral rehabilitation in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and non-clefts patients using 3D stereophotogrammetry.采用三维体视摄影术评估完全性单侧唇腭裂患者和非唇腭裂患者正畸治疗和口腔修复后的牙弓稳定性。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01143-1.
5
Centre-level variation of treatment and outcome in 5-year-old children with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate: The Cleft Care UK study. Part 1: Methodology and results for dento-facial outcomes.非综合征性单侧唇腭裂5岁患儿治疗与结局的中心水平差异:英国腭裂护理研究。第1部分:牙颌面结局的方法和结果
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Jun;20 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):1-7. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12183.
6
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Young Adults Treated for Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate by a Treatment Protocol Including Two-Stage Palatoplasty: Speech Outcomes.采用包括两阶段腭裂修复术的治疗方案对单侧完全性唇腭裂青少年进行长期随访研究:语音结果
Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):202-209. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.202. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
Effect of Relaxing Incisions on the Maxillary Growth after Primary Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair in Mild and Moderate Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.松弛切口对轻中度单侧腭裂一期修复术后上颌骨生长的影响:一项随机临床试验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan 16;5(1):e1201. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001201. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Long-term mid-facial growth of patients with a unilateral complete cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated by two-stage palatoplasty: cephalometric analysis.单侧完全性唇腭裂患者行两阶段腭裂修复术后的中长期面中部生长:头影测量分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1801-1810. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1949-2. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
Which index should be used to measure primary surgical outcome for unilateral cleft lip and palate patients?对于单侧唇腭裂患者,应使用哪个指标来衡量初次手术结果?
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Aug;38(4):345-52. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw013. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
10
Centralization of cleft care in the UK. Part 6: a tale of two studies.英国唇腭裂护理的集中化。第6部分:两项研究的故事。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Nov;18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):56-62. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12111.