Söderström Staffan T, Pettersson Richard P, Leppert Jerzy
Hjärnskadeenheten (Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit), Centrallasarettet in Västerås, Sweden.
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Oct;47(5):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00550.x.
The aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of a neuropsychological test battery relating to an on-the-road driving evaluation and to determine whether patients who failed the driving test could improve their driving through behind-the-wheel training. Thirty-four stroke patients were compared with 20 healthy, matched controls. Patients who failed the driving test were offered driving practice at a driving school and were then reassessed (neuropsychologically and practically). On most of the cognitive tests, patients performed significantly less well than control subjects. Almost 50% of the controls and the patients failed the driving evaluation. None of the neuropsychological tests was able to predict the driving outcome. Of the patients who failed the first driving evaluation, 85% passed the second evaluation after driving practice. There are few controlled studies focusing on the stroke population and the effect of behind-the-wheel training. It is suggested that more controlled studies are needed with more homogenous patient-groups and reliable and quantitative outcome measures.
本研究的目的是检验一套与道路驾驶评估相关的神经心理测试的预测价值,并确定驾驶测试未通过的患者能否通过实际驾驶训练提高其驾驶能力。将34名中风患者与20名健康的、匹配的对照组进行比较。驾驶测试未通过的患者在驾校接受驾驶练习,然后再次进行评估(神经心理和实际驾驶方面)。在大多数认知测试中,患者的表现明显不如对照组。近50%的对照组和患者驾驶评估未通过。没有一项神经心理测试能够预测驾驶结果。在首次驾驶评估未通过的患者中,85%在驾驶练习后通过了第二次评估。很少有对照研究关注中风人群以及实际驾驶训练的效果。建议开展更多对照研究,纳入更同质的患者群体以及可靠的定量结果指标。