Suppr超能文献

在接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的重症监护病房患者中,示波法测量的肱动脉平均动脉压高于桡动脉平均动脉压。

Oscillometric brachial mean artery pressures are higher than intra-radial mean artery pressures in intensive care unit patients receiving norepinephrine.

作者信息

Pytte M, Dybwik K, Sexton J, Straume B, Nielsen E Waage

机构信息

Department of Anaesthaesiology and Intensive Care, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Jul;50(6):718-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01045.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Norepinephrine is frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise and maintain an adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP). Conflict arises as to which MAP should guide vasopressor dose, as oscillometric MAP in the brachial artery often diverges from intra-radial MAP. We wanted to estimate the magnitude of this difference in ICU patients receiving norepinephrine, and to see whether the patient age, norepinephrine dose, age of radial catheter, ventilation treatment or severity of illness influenced the difference.

METHODS

Prospective observational study comparing oscillometric MAP and intra-radial MAP performed in a central hospital-based surgical ICU during the period from February 2002 through to October 2003. Sixty-eight consecutive patients who received a norepinephrine infusion to maintain MAP above 70 mmHg were included. The mean arterial blood pressure was measured both oscillometrically and in the ipsilateral radial artery.

RESULTS

Oscillometric MAP was on average 6.6 mmHg higher (95% CI 5.3-7.9) than intra-radial MAP in the 134 sets of measurements (P < 0.001). The patient's age (P = 0.319), norepinephrine dosage (P = 0.959) the age of the radial catheter (P = 0.992) were not significant. The difference in MAP was marginally greater in ventilated patients (P = 0.061) and significantly greater as the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) score increased (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

MAP measured oscillometrically over the brachial artery directly in the radial artery gave different results in an ICU population receiving norepinephrine. In more than one of four patients this difference is so large, and increases with illness severity, that the selection of any one method would influence treatment.

摘要

背景

去甲肾上腺素常用于重症监护病房(ICU)患者以升高并维持足够的平均动脉压(MAP)。由于肱动脉示波法测量的MAP常与桡动脉内MAP存在差异,对于应以何种MAP来指导血管升压药剂量的问题存在争议。我们旨在评估接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的ICU患者中这种差异的程度,并观察患者年龄、去甲肾上腺素剂量、桡动脉导管使用时长、通气治疗或疾病严重程度是否会影响这种差异。

方法

2002年2月至2003年10月期间,在一家中心医院的外科ICU进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,比较肱动脉示波法测量的MAP和桡动脉内MAP。纳入68例连续接受去甲肾上腺素输注以维持MAP高于70 mmHg的患者。同时采用示波法和同侧桡动脉穿刺法测量平均动脉血压。

结果

在134组测量中,示波法测量的MAP平均比桡动脉内MAP高6.6 mmHg(95%可信区间5.3 - 7.9)(P < 0.001)。患者年龄(P = 0.319)、去甲肾上腺素剂量(P = 0.959)、桡动脉导管使用时长(P = 0.992)对差异无显著影响。通气患者的MAP差异略大(P = 0.061),且随着简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)的增加差异显著增大(P = 0.022)。

结论

在接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的ICU患者中,通过肱动脉直接示波法测量的MAP与桡动脉内测量结果不同。超过四分之一的患者中这种差异很大,且随疾病严重程度增加,选择任何一种测量方法都会影响治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验