• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无创评估中心和外周动脉压(波形):校准方法的意义。

Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Belgium.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2010 Feb;28(2):300-5. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283340a1a.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283340a1a
PMID:19901847
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure (BP) from radial artery pressure waveforms is increasingly applied. We investigated the impact of radial artery waveform calibration on central BP assessment and calculated pressure amplification, with focus on the one-third rule used to estimate mean arterial BP (MAP).

METHODS

Pressure waveforms were noninvasively measured at the radial and carotid arteries in 1873 individuals (age 45.8+/-6.1 years). Radial and carotid artery waveforms were calibrated using brachial artery DBP and SBP, MAP estimated with the one-third rule and MAP estimated as brachial DBP along with 40% of brachial artery pulse pressure.

RESULTS

Central SBP obtained via a transfer function was 123.5 +/- 15.7, 117.8 +/- 14.2 and 126.0 +/- 15.4 mmHg (mean +/- SD) following above-mentioned three calibration schemes, respectively. Using the same calibration schemes, carotid artery SBP was 131.4 +/- 15.2, 118.4 +/- 14.4 and 126.8 +/- 15.7 mmHg, respectively. Central-to-brachial amplification was 13.0 +/- 3.6 mmHg using second method as compared with 4.6 +/- 3.8 mmHg with third method. Brachial-to-radial amplification was actually negative (-6.3 +/- 4.5 mmHg) using second method, whereas 3.4 +/- 5.5 mmHg was found with third method.

CONCLUSION

Both carotid artery SBP and central SBP obtained via a transfer function are highly sensitive to the calibration of the respective carotid artery and radial artery pressure waveforms. Our data suggest that the one-third rule to calculate MAP from brachial cuff BP should be avoided, especially when used to calibrate radial artery pressure waveforms for subsequent application of a pressure transfer function. Until more precise estimation methods become available, it is advisable to use 40% of brachial pulse pressure instead of 33% to assess MAP.

摘要

目的

从桡动脉压力波形无创估计中心血压(BP)的应用越来越广泛。我们研究了桡动脉波形校准对中心 BP 评估的影响,并计算了压力放大,重点是用于估计平均动脉压(MAP)的三分之一规则。

方法

在 1873 名个体(年龄 45.8+/-6.1 岁)中,非侵入性地测量桡动脉和颈动脉的压力波形。使用肱动脉 DBP 和 SBP 校准桡动脉和颈动脉波形,使用三分之一规则估计 MAP,以及使用肱动脉 DBP 加上肱动脉脉搏压的 40%估计 MAP。

结果

通过传递函数获得的中心 SBP 分别为 123.5 +/- 15.7、117.8 +/- 14.2 和 126.0 +/- 15.4mmHg(平均值 +/- SD),采用上述三种校准方案。使用相同的校准方案,颈动脉 SBP 分别为 131.4 +/- 15.2、118.4 +/- 14.4 和 126.8 +/- 15.7mmHg。与第三种方法相比,第二种方法的中心-肱动脉放大率为 13.0 +/- 3.6mmHg,而第二种方法的实际为负(-6.3 +/- 4.5mmHg)。

结论

通过传递函数获得的颈动脉 SBP 和中心 SBP 都对各自的颈动脉和桡动脉压力波形的校准高度敏感。我们的数据表明,从臂袖 BP 计算 MAP 的三分之一规则应该避免,特别是在用于校准桡动脉压力波形以随后应用压力传递函数时。在更精确的估计方法可用之前,建议使用肱动脉脉搏压的 40%代替 33%来评估 MAP。

相似文献

1
Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods.无创评估中心和外周动脉压(波形):校准方法的意义。
J Hypertens. 2010 Feb;28(2):300-5. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283340a1a.
2
Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.桡动脉波形无创校准对传递函数衍生的中心主动脉波形特征误差的影响。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2004 Aug;107(2):205-11. doi: 10.1042/CS20030294.
3
Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.校准误差(输入)通过广义传递函数在不同血流动力学状态下传递至主动脉压力(输出)。
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 7;110(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.07.014. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
4
Intra-arterial analysis of the best calibration methods to estimate aortic blood pressure.经动脉分析评估主动脉血压的最佳校准方法。
J Hypertens. 2019 Feb;37(2):307-315. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001902.
5
The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者中心主动脉血压的无创估计
J Hypertens. 2008 Dec;26(12):2381-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328313919f.
6
Pulse pressure amplification, pressure waveform calibration and clinical applications.脉搏压增强、压力波形校准及其临床应用。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Sep;224(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.06.055. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave.桡动脉与中心动脉脉搏波之间的关系以及利用桡动脉脉搏波评估中心主动脉压
Hypertens Res. 2007 Mar;30(3):219-28. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.219.
8
Determining carotid artery pressure from scaled diameter waveforms: comparison and validation of calibration techniques in 2026 subjects.从缩放后的直径波形确定颈动脉压力:2026名受试者校准技术的比较与验证
Physiol Meas. 2008 Nov;29(11):1267-80. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/003. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
9
Central blood pressure estimation in type 1 diabetes: impact and implications of peripheral calibration method.1型糖尿病患者中心血压的估计:外周校准方法的影响及意义
J Hypertens. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):115-121. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003308. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
10
Clinical usefulness of the second peak of radial systolic blood pressure for estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure.桡动脉收缩压第二峰值对估计主动脉收缩压的临床实用性。
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Aug;23(8):538-45. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.154. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of race-free eGFR equations in individuals of different ethnicity.不同种族个体中无种族因素的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)方程的评估。
Blood Press. 2025 Dec;34(1):2533456. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2025.2533456. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
Non-invasive estimation of beat-by-beat aortic blood pressures from electrical impedance tomography data processed by machine learning.通过机器学习处理电阻抗断层扫描数据对逐搏主动脉血压进行无创估计。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01274-2.
3
Value and Variability of Pulse Shape Indicator for Estimating Mean Arterial Pressure in the Radial and Femoral Arteries.
用于估计桡动脉和股动脉平均动脉压的脉搏形状指标的价值与变异性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e031969. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031969. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
4
Central-to-peripheral blood pressure amplification: role of the recording site, technology, analysis approach, and calibration scheme in invasive and non-invasive data agreement.中心到外周血压放大:记录部位、技术、分析方法以及校准方案在有创和无创数据一致性中的作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 11;10:1256221. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1256221. eCollection 2023.
5
Direct estimation of central aortic pressure from measured or quantified mean and diastolic brachial blood pressure: agreement with invasive records.根据测量或量化的肱动脉平均血压和舒张压直接估算中心主动脉压:与有创记录的一致性
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 25;10:1207069. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1207069. eCollection 2023.
6
Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods.有创和无创获取主动脉收缩压和脉压:记录技术、测量动脉部位、波形分析算法及校准方法的比较分析
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 16;14:1113972. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1113972. eCollection 2023.
7
New Method to Estimate Central Systolic Blood Pressure From Peripheral Pressure: A Proof of Concept and Validation Study.从外周血压估算中心收缩压的新方法:概念验证与验证研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 15;8:772613. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.772613. eCollection 2021.
8
Personalization of electro-mechanical models of the pressure-overloaded left ventricle: fitting of Windkessel-type afterload models.压力超负荷左心室机电模型的个性化:Windkessel 型后负荷模型的拟合。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190342. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0342. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
Relationships between serum free fatty acid and pulse pressure amplification in overweight/obese men: insights from exercise training and dietary modification.超重/肥胖男性血清游离脂肪酸与脉压放大之间的关系:运动训练和饮食调整的启示
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2018 May;62(3):254-258. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.17-103. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
Central Hemodynamics for Management of Arteriosclerotic Diseases.《动脉硬化性疾病的中心血液动力学管理》
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017 Aug 1;24(8):765-778. doi: 10.5551/jat.40717. Epub 2017 Jun 10.