Livingston B T, Killian C E, Wilt F, Cameron A, Landrum M J, Ermolaeva O, Sapojnikov V, Maglott D R, Buchanan A M, Ettensohn C A
Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Dev Biol. 2006 Dec 1;300(1):335-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.047. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Biomineralization, the biologically controlled formation of mineral deposits, is of widespread importance in biology, medicine, and engineering. Mineralized structures are found in most metazoan phyla and often have supportive, protective, or feeding functions. Among deuterostomes, only echinoderms and vertebrates produce extensive biomineralized structures. Although skeletons appeared independently in these two groups, ancestors of the vertebrates and echinoderms may have utilized similar components of a shared genetic "toolkit" to carry out biomineralization. The present study had two goals. First, we sought to expand our understanding of the proteins involved in biomineralization in the sea urchin, a powerful model system for analyzing the basic cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie this process. Second, we sought to shed light on the possible evolutionary relationships between biomineralization in echinoderms and vertebrates. We used several computational methods to survey the genome of the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus for gene products involved in biomineralization. Our analysis has greatly expanded the collection of biomineralization-related proteins. We have found that these proteins are often members of small families encoded by genes that are clustered in the genome. Most of the proteins are sea urchin-specific; that is, they have no apparent homologues in other invertebrate deuterostomes or vertebrates. Similarly, many of the vertebrate proteins that mediate mineral deposition do not have counterparts in the S. purpuratus genome. Our findings therefore reveal substantial differences in the primary sequences of proteins that mediate biomineral formation in echinoderms and vertebrates, possibly reflecting loose constraints on the primary structures of the proteins involved. On the other hand, certain cellular and molecular processes associated with earlier events in skeletogenesis appear similar in echinoderms and vertebrates, leaving open the possibility of deeper evolutionary relationships.
生物矿化,即生物控制的矿物质沉积形成过程,在生物学、医学和工程学中具有广泛的重要性。矿化结构存在于大多数后生动物门类中,并且通常具有支撑、保护或进食功能。在后口动物中,只有棘皮动物和脊椎动物会产生广泛的生物矿化结构。尽管这两类动物的骨骼是独立出现的,但脊椎动物和棘皮动物的祖先可能利用了共享遗传“工具包”中的相似成分来进行生物矿化。本研究有两个目标。首先,我们试图扩展对海胆生物矿化相关蛋白质的理解,海胆是分析这一过程基础的基本细胞和分子机制的有力模型系统。其次,我们试图阐明棘皮动物和脊椎动物生物矿化之间可能的进化关系。我们使用了几种计算方法来在紫海胆(Strongylocentrotus purpuratus)的基因组中搜索参与生物矿化的基因产物。我们的分析极大地扩展了生物矿化相关蛋白质的集合。我们发现这些蛋白质通常是由基因组中聚集的基因编码的小家族成员。大多数蛋白质是海胆特有的;也就是说,它们在其他无脊椎后口动物或脊椎动物中没有明显的同源物。同样,许多介导矿物质沉积的脊椎动物蛋白质在紫海胆基因组中也没有对应物。因此,我们的研究结果揭示了介导棘皮动物和脊椎动物生物矿化形成的蛋白质一级序列存在显著差异,这可能反映了对所涉及蛋白质一级结构的宽松限制。另一方面,与骨骼发生早期事件相关的某些细胞和分子过程在棘皮动物和脊椎动物中似乎相似,这使得更深层次进化关系的可能性仍然存在。