Trigano Alexandre, Blandeau Olivier, Dale Christian, Wong Man-Faï, Wiart Joe
Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, 13915 Marseille, France.
Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.013. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
This study examined cellular phone ringing interference with automated external defibrillators (AED).
The phone systems tested were two single band handheld telephones: (1) a Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) receiver; and (2) a Personal Communication Services (PCS) receiver. The ringing phase of a digital cellular phone includes a brief burst of peak-emitted power. The GSM had a maximum power output of 2 W, operating on a 900 MHz carrier frequency, and the PCS had a maximum output of 1 W, operating on a 1800 MHz carrier frequency. During AED monitoring, the digital cellular telephone was placed successively in three positions: (1) on the AED; (2) on the patient's chest between the electrodes; and (3) on the connector between the electrodes and the AED cable. After positioning the cellular phone, calls were placed during the AED analyzing phase.
Three AED models were tested using their original electrodes: (1) LifePak 20 monitor/defibrillator device; (2) Lifepak 20 P monitor/defibrillator/stimulator (Medtronic Emergency Response Systems, Redmond, WA, USA); and (3) HeartStart XL M4735A monitor/defibrillator (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA). The first two devices had Quik-Combo electrodes and the third device had Adults Plus multifunction electrodes. Ninety-one tests were performed on 13 patients. The only disturbance provoked by testing was noise emitted by the AED speaker when the receiver was close to the device. The noise began 2-4 s before the first audible ringing tone and persisted throughout the ringing phase. The distance at which this effect could be prevented was 15 cm.
Clinical testing during ECG monitoring by an AED during call from a cellular phone did not show any analysis dysfunction during unshockable rhythms and provoked only transient dysfunction of the speaker device.
本研究检测手机铃声对自动体外除颤器(AED)的干扰。
测试的电话系统为两部单频段手持电话:(1)一部全球移动通信系统(GSM)接收器;(2)一部个人通信服务(PCS)接收器。数字蜂窝电话的振铃阶段包括短暂的峰值发射功率脉冲。GSM的最大功率输出为2W,工作在900MHz载波频率上,PCS的最大功率输出为1W,工作在1800MHz载波频率上。在AED监测期间,将数字蜂窝电话依次放置在三个位置:(1)AED上;(2)患者胸部电极之间;(3)电极与AED电缆之间的连接器上。放置好手机后,在AED分析阶段拨打电话。
使用其原装电极测试了三种AED型号:(1)LifePak 20监护/除颤器设备;(2)Lifepak 20 P监护/除颤/刺激器(美敦力应急响应系统公司,美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德);(3)HeartStart XL M4735A监护/除颤器(飞利浦医疗系统公司,美国马萨诸塞州安多弗)。前两种设备配备快速组合电极,第三种设备配备成人增强型多功能电极。对13名患者进行了91次测试。测试引起的唯一干扰是当接收器靠近设备时AED扬声器发出的噪声。噪声在第一个可听见的振铃音之前2 - 4秒开始,并在整个振铃阶段持续。可防止这种影响的距离为15厘米。
在手机通话期间,AED进行心电图监测时的临床测试未显示在不可电击心律期间有任何分析功能障碍,仅引起扬声器设备的短暂功能障碍。