Wu Yen-Wen, Tadamura Eiji, Yamamuro Masaki, Kanao Shotaro, Nakayama Kazuki, Togashi Kaori
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Jan;61(1):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
To evaluate the influence of heart rate (HR) on magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) image quality in diastolic and systolic phases.
Twenty-seven healthy volunteers (9 men; 33+/-9 years, HR 53-110 bpm), were evaluated with the electrocardiography and three-dimensional navigator-gating MRCA in a 1.5-T MR scanner (Avanto, Siemens) in diastolic and systolic phases (steady-state free precession; TR/TE/flip angle=3.2 ms/1.6 ms/90 degrees). The timing of scanning was individually adapted to the cardiac rest periods obtained in the prescanning, by visually identifying when the movement of right coronary artery was minimized during diastole and systole. Images of two phases were side-by-side compared on a four-point scale (from 1=poor to 4=excellent visibility; score of 3 or 4 as diagnostic).
Of 13 subjects with HR < or =65 bpm (low HR group, mean 59.8+/-4.9 bpm, range 53-65), the image quality scores were significantly better than that with higher heart rates (73.9+/-9.0 bpm, range 68-110) in diastolic MRCA. The image quality was significantly improved during systole in high HR group. Overall, 91.3% of low HR group had MRCA image of diagnostic quality acquired at diastole, while 88.3% of high HR group had diagnostic images at systole by segmental analysis (p=NS).
MRCA at systole offered superior quality in patients with high heart rates.
评估心率(HR)对舒张期和收缩期磁共振冠状动脉造影(MRCA)图像质量的影响。
27名健康志愿者(9名男性;33±9岁,心率53 - 110次/分钟),在1.5T磁共振扫描仪(Avanto,西门子)中,通过心电图和三维导航门控技术进行舒张期和收缩期MRCA评估(稳态自由进动;TR/TE/翻转角 = 3.2毫秒/1.6毫秒/90度)。扫描时间根据预扫描时获得的心脏静止期进行个体化调整,通过视觉识别舒张期和收缩期右冠状动脉运动何时最小化来确定。将两个阶段的图像以四点量表进行并排比较(从1 = 差到4 = 极佳可视性;3分或4分作为可诊断)。
在13名心率≤65次/分钟的受试者(低心率组,平均59.8±4.9次/分钟,范围53 - 65)中,舒张期MRCA的图像质量评分显著优于心率较高者(73.9±9.0次/分钟,范围68 - 110)。高心率组在收缩期图像质量显著改善。总体而言,低心率组91.3%在舒张期获得了具有诊断质量的MRCA图像,而高心率组88.3%在收缩期通过节段分析获得了诊断图像(p = 无显著差异)。
对于心率较高的患者,收缩期MRCA提供了更高的图像质量。