Suppr超能文献

托莫西汀治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍随机对照临床试验中攻击或敌意事件的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of aggression or hostility events in randomized, controlled clinical trials of atomoxetine for ADHD.

作者信息

Polzer John, Bangs Mark E, Zhang Shuyu, Dellva Mary Anne, Tauscher-Wisniewski Sitra, Acharya Nayan, Watson Susan B, Allen Albert J, Wilens Timothy E

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 1;61(5):713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.044. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We systematically examined potential aggression/hostility-related events in a meta-analysis of acute clinical trials of atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHODS

Pediatric patients from 14 trials of atomoxetine were subdivided into a placebo-controlled (atomoxetine n = 1308, placebo n = 806) or active comparator databases (atomoxetine n = 566, methylphenidate n = 472). A third database comprised adult patients from placebo-controlled studies (atomoxetine n = 541, placebo n = 405). A computerized search of adverse events and comments identified patients with potential aggression/hostility events. Mantel-Haenszel incidence differences (MHID) were calculated.

RESULTS

In the placebo-controlled database, we observed 21 atomoxetine and 9 placebo patients with reported aggression/hostility events, MHID of .6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -.4, 1.7). In the active comparator database, there were seven events in atomoxetine and four in methylphenidate patients, MHID = .2% (95% CI: -1.0,1.3). In the adult database, there were no events in 0 atomoxetine and one placebo patient, MHID = -.3% (95% CI: -.8, .2).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggression/hostility-related events occurred in less than 2% of patients and were more frequent in pediatric patients treated with atomoxetine versus placebo (risk ratio of 1.33; not statistically significant). The risk of aggression/hostility events was similar in patients treated with atomoxetine or methylphenidate.

摘要

背景

我们在一项关于托莫西汀治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的急性临床试验的荟萃分析中,系统地研究了潜在的攻击/敌意相关事件。

方法

来自14项托莫西汀试验的儿科患者被分为安慰剂对照(托莫西汀n = 1308,安慰剂n = 806)或活性对照数据库(托莫西汀n = 566,哌甲酯n = 472)。第三个数据库包括来自安慰剂对照研究的成年患者(托莫西汀n = 541,安慰剂n = 405)。通过计算机搜索不良事件和评论来识别有潜在攻击/敌意事件的患者。计算Mantel-Haenszel发病率差异(MHID)。

结果

在安慰剂对照数据库中,我们观察到21名服用托莫西汀和9名服用安慰剂的患者报告了攻击/敌意事件,MHID为0.6%(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.4,1.7)。在活性对照数据库中,托莫西汀患者中有7起事件,哌甲酯患者中有4起事件,MHID = 0.2%(95% CI:-1.0,1.3)。在成年数据库中,服用托莫西汀的0名患者和1名服用安慰剂的患者均未发生事件,MHID = -0.3%(95% CI:-0.8,0.2)。

结论

攻击/敌意相关事件发生在不到2%的患者中,在接受托莫西汀治疗的儿科患者中比接受安慰剂治疗的患者更常见(风险比为1.33;无统计学意义)。接受托莫西汀或哌甲酯治疗的患者发生攻击/敌意事件的风险相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验