Turnovska Tanya H, Mandadzhieva Stoilka K, Marinov Blagoi I, Kostianev Stefan S
Department of Hygiene and Ecomedicine, Medical University, Vassil Aprilov Blvd., 15 A, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Jan;210(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
The aim of the present study was to analyze the respiratory and cardiovascular functions among smoking and nonsmoking girls attending two schools situated in regions with different levels of air pollution. The characteristic of air pollution is based on the data gathered by stations 1 and 2 belonging to the Uniform National System for Monitoring the Air Pollution in Bulgaria. The participants (n=108, 16.07+/-0.80 years) were separated in two groups: smokers (S1 - from school 1, S2 - from school 2) and nonsmokers (NS1 - from school 1, NS2 - from school 2). All of them performed pulmonary function testing and .cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill using our modification of the Balke protocol (Marinov et al., 2000). Reference values for European children, previously validated for the Bulgarian population, were used.
There are no significant differences in mean levels of VC, IC, FEV1, MEF50 and MEF25 (as a percentage from the predicted value as well). The average level of the Tiffneau index is noticeably higher among nonsmokers from the two regions and is the lowest among smokers from the more polluted area, but a significant difference exists between S2 (88.7+/-5.9) and NS2 (92.6+/-4.7), p=0.047; T(L,CO)%pred: S1 (85.4+/-7.2) vs. S2 (86.7+/-8.2), p=0.048 and NS1 (88.3+/-8.2) vs. NS2 (92.8+/-14.5), p=0.037; V(E)%pred: S1 (127.5+/-9.6) vs. S2 (123.7+/-6.1), p=0.035; higher levels of total lung capacity (TLC%pred), S1 (107.3+/-9.2) vs. NS2 (104.3+/-9.1), p=0.009 and alveolar ventilation (VA), S1 (5.0+/-0.6) vs. NS2 (4.6+/-0.5), p=0.008.
本研究旨在分析就读于空气污染程度不同地区两所学校的吸烟与不吸烟女孩的呼吸和心血管功能。空气污染特征基于保加利亚国家统一空气污染监测系统1号和2号站点收集的数据。参与者(n = 108,年龄16.07±0.80岁)分为两组:吸烟者(S1 - 来自学校1,S2 - 来自学校2)和不吸烟者(NS1 - 来自学校1,NS2 - 来自学校2)。所有人都按照我们对巴尔克方案的修改版(马里诺夫等人,2000年)在跑步机上进行了肺功能测试和心肺运动测试。使用先前针对保加利亚人群验证过的欧洲儿童参考值。
肺活量(VC)、吸气量(IC)、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、最大呼气中期流速50%(MEF50)和最大呼气中期流速25%(MEF25)的平均水平(同样以预测值的百分比表示)无显著差异。两个地区不吸烟者的蒂夫诺指数平均水平明显较高(以预测值的百分比表示),而污染较严重地区吸烟者的该指数平均水平最低,但S2组(88.7±5.9)与NS2组(92.6±4.7)之间存在显著差异,p = 0.047;肺一氧化碳弥散量占预计值百分比(T(L,CO)%pred):S1组(85.4±7.2)与S2组(86.7±8.2),p = 0.048,NS1组(88.3±8.2)与NS2组(92.8±14.5),p = 0.037;每分通气量占预计值百分比(V(E)%pred):S1组(127.5±9.6)与S2组(123.7±6.1),p = 0.035;肺总量占预计值百分比(TLC%pred)水平较高,S1组(107.3±9.2)与NS2组(104.3±9.1),p = 0.009,以及肺泡通气量(VA),S1组(5.0±0.6)与NS2组(4.6±0.5),p = 0.008。