Fox Ervin R, Han Hui, Taylor Herman A, Walls Ulysses C, Samdarshi Tandaw, Skelton Thomas N, Pan Jun, Arnett Donna
NHLBI's Atherosclerotic Risk in Communities Study, Jackson, MS, USA.
Am Heart J. 2006 Oct;152(4):749-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.014.
Although recent data suggest that the mitral diastolic early-to-late (E/A) ratio may be prognostic in selected population-based cohorts, its predictive value for morbidity and mortality in African Americans has not yet been well studied.
The study population consisted of African American participants from the Jackson cohort of the Atherosclerotic Risks in Community Study. Three subgroups of E/A ratios were defined: E/A <0.7, E/A 0.7-1.5, and E/A >1.5, using the middle group as reference. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between the E/A ratio and both all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). The mean follow-up period was 6.8 +/- 1.3 years.
Of the 2211 participants in the study population (mean age 62 years, 65.1% women), 8.2% had an E/A ratio <0.7, 84.7% had an E/A 0.7-1.5, and 7.1% had an E/A >1.5. An E/A >1.5 was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-4.03) in the multivariable model. An E/A <0.7 was associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.17-2.73) and incident CVD (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.29-2.83) compared with a normal E/A in the age and sex adjusted model but was not independently predictive in the multivariable model (P > .05).
In a population-based cohort of middle-aged African Americans, an E/A >1.5 independently predicts all-cause mortality. An E/A >1.5 and an E/A <0.7 were both associated with incident CVD when adjusted for age and sex alone but were not independently predictive in the multivariable analysis.
尽管近期数据表明二尖瓣舒张早期与晚期(E/A)比值在特定基于人群的队列研究中可能具有预后价值,但其对非裔美国人发病和死亡的预测价值尚未得到充分研究。
研究人群包括社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究杰克逊队列中的非裔美国参与者。使用中间组作为参照,将E/A比值分为三个亚组:E/A<0.7、E/A 0.7 - 1.5和E/A>1.5。采用Cox比例风险模型评估E/A比值与全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)发病之间的关联。平均随访期为6.8±1.3年。
在研究人群的2211名参与者中(平均年龄62岁,65.1%为女性),8.2%的E/A比值<0.7,84.7%的E/A为0.7 - 1.5,7.1%的E/A>1.5。在多变量模型中,E/A>1.5与全因死亡率独立相关(风险比[HR]2.18,95%置信区间[CI]1.20 - 4.03)。在年龄和性别调整模型中,与正常E/A相比,E/A<0.7与更高的全因死亡率(HR 1.79,95%CI 1.17 - 2.73)和CVD发病相关(HR 1.91,95%CI 1.29 - 2.83),但在多变量模型中无独立预测性(P>.05)。
在基于人群的中年非裔美国人队列中,E/A>1.5独立预测全因死亡率。单独调整年龄和性别时,E/A>1.5和E/A<0.7均与CVD发病相关,但在多变量分析中无独立预测性。