Use and efficacy of abciximab in an unselected population with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: data from AMI-Florence registry.

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the determinants and the potential benefit of abciximab use in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Based on the AMI-Florence registry, we analyzed 461 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty, 280 (61%) of whom received abciximab. For each patient, a propensity score indicating the likelihood of abciximab treatment was calculated. Compared to those not treated, patients treated with abciximab were at lower risk. At multivariate analysis, the direct admission to a hospital with angioplasty facilities significantly increased the probability of receiving abciximab (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.30-3.03, p=.001), while older age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p<.0001), non-anterior location (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88, p=.011) and Killip class >1 (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.87, p=.013), were negative predictors of abciximab use. Primary angioplasty had a higher success rate in patients treated with abciximab (99.3% versus 96.5%, p=.03). In-hospital and 1-year mortality were significantly lower in patients treated with abciximab (2.5% versus 13.3%, p<.0001, and 7% versus 21%, p<.0001, respectively). At multivariate analysis patients treated with abciximab had a significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.93, p=.035), and a marginally lower risk of death at 1-year follow-up (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-1.03, p=.065). These results did not change when the propensity score was included into the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real practice, abciximab is more frequently used in patients at lower risk, particularly when directly admitted to a hospital with angioplasty facilities. Abciximab use is associated with a significant reduction in early mortality. A trend toward a reduced mortality is maintained also at 1 year.