• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估自伤后风险的临床工具。

A clinical tool for assessing risk after self-harm.

作者信息

Cooper Jayne, Kapur Navneet, Dunning Joel, Guthrie Else, Appleby Louis, Mackway-Jones Kevin

机构信息

Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.944.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.944
PMID:16997684
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to develop a risk-stratification model for use by emergency department (ED) clinical staff in the assessment of patients attending with self-harm.

METHODS

Participants were patients who attended 5 EDs in Manchester and Salford, England, after self-harm between September 1, 1997, and February 28, 2001. Social, demographic, and clinical information was collected for each patient at each attendance. With data from the Manchester and Salford Self-Harm Project, a clinical decision rule was derived by using recursive partitioning to discriminate between patients at higher and lower risk of repetition or subsequent suicide occurring within 6 months. Data from 3 EDs were used for the derivation set. The model was validated with data from the remaining 2 EDs.

RESULTS

Data for 9,086 patients who presented with self-harm were collected during this study period, including 17% that reattended within 6 months and 22 patients who died by suicide within 6 months. A 4-question rule, with a sensitivity of 94% (92.1-95.0% [95% confidence interval]) and specificity of 25% (24.2-26.5% [95% confidence interval]), was derived to identify patients at higher risk of repetition or suicide.

CONCLUSION

Application of this simple, highly sensitive rule may facilitate assessment in the ED and help to focus psychiatric resources on patients at higher risk.

摘要

研究目的

我们的目标是开发一种风险分层模型,供急诊科临床工作人员用于评估自残就诊患者。

方法

研究对象为1997年9月1日至2001年2月28日期间在英国曼彻斯特和索尔福德的5家急诊科因自残就诊的患者。每次就诊时收集每位患者的社会、人口统计学和临床信息。利用曼彻斯特和索尔福德自残项目的数据,通过递归划分得出一个临床决策规则,以区分6个月内重复自残或随后自杀风险较高和较低的患者。来自3家急诊科的数据用于推导集。该模型用其余2家急诊科的数据进行验证。

结果

在本研究期间收集了9086例自残患者的数据,其中17%在6个月内再次就诊,22例在6个月内自杀死亡。得出了一个包含4个问题的规则,其敏感度为94%(92.1 - 95.0%[95%置信区间]),特异度为25%(24.2 - 26.5%[95%置信区间]),用于识别重复自残或自杀风险较高的患者。

结论

应用这个简单、高敏感度的规则可能有助于急诊科的评估,并有助于将精神科资源集中于高风险患者。

相似文献

1
A clinical tool for assessing risk after self-harm.一种用于评估自伤后风险的临床工具。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.944.
2
Factors that influence emergency department doctors' assessment of suicide risk in deliberate self-harm patients.影响急诊科医生对故意自伤患者自杀风险评估的因素。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2003 Dec;10(4):283-7. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200312000-00008.
3
Deliberate self-harm patients in the emergency department: who will repeat and who will not? Validation and development of clinical decision rules.急诊科故意自伤患者:哪些人会重复自伤,哪些人不会?临床决策规则的验证和制定。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):650-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201235. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
4
The development of a population-level clinical screening tool for self-harm repetition and suicide: the ReACT Self-Harm Rule.用于重复自伤和自杀的人群层面临床筛查工具的开发:ReACT自伤规则
Psychol Med. 2012 Nov;42(11):2383-94. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000347. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
5
Assessment of self harm in an accident and emergency service - the development of a proforma to assess suicide intent and mental state in those presenting to the emergency department with self harm.在急症室评估自残行为-为那些因自残而到急症室就诊的人制定评估自杀意图和精神状态的表格。
Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Nov;22 Suppl 1:S26-32.
6
Self-harm or attempted suicide? Do suicide notes help us decide the level of intent in those who survive?是自残还是自杀未遂?遗书能帮助我们判定幸存者的自杀意图程度吗?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Jul;15(3):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
7
First episode of self-harm in older age: a report from the 10-year prospective Manchester Self-Harm project.老年期首次自残:来自 10 年前瞻性曼彻斯特自残项目的报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;72(6):737-43. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06501.
8
Survey of California emergency departments about practices for management of suicidal patients and resources available for their care.关于加利福尼亚州急诊科对自杀患者的管理实践及可用于其护理的资源的调查。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):452-8, 458.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.026. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
9
Self-harm in England: a tale of three cities. Multicentre study of self-harm.英格兰的自我伤害:三个城市的故事。自我伤害的多中心研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):513-21. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0199-7. Epub 2007 May 21.
10
Improving the design of the assessment of emergency department patients at risk for self-harm.改进对有自残风险的急诊科患者的评估设计。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):467-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of repeat self-harm among individuals presenting to healthcare services: development and validation of a clinical risk assessment model (OxSET).就诊于医疗保健服务的个体再次自我伤害的风险:临床风险评估模型(OxSET)的制定与验证。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 15;27(1):e301180. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301180.
2
Development and evaluation of a predictive algorithm and telehealth intervention to reduce suicidal behavior among university students.开发和评估一种预测算法和远程医疗干预措施,以减少大学生的自杀行为。
Psychol Med. 2024 Apr;54(5):971-979. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002714. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Risk of death by suicide following self-harm presentations to healthcare: development and validation of a multivariable clinical prediction rule (OxSATS).
自残后自杀死亡风险:多变量临床预测规则(OxSATS)的制定和验证。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 May;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300673.
4
Tools to Detect Risk of Death by Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.自杀死亡风险检测工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 16;84(1):21r14385. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21r14385.
5
Development and validation of the Durham Risk Score for estimating suicide attempt risk: A prospective cohort analysis.发展和验证达勒姆风险评分以估计自杀企图风险:一项前瞻性队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 5;18(8):e1003713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003713. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Accuracy of individual and combined risk-scale items in the prediction of repetition of self-harm: multicentre prospective cohort study.个体及综合风险量表项目在预测自我伤害重复发生方面的准确性:多中心前瞻性队列研究
BJPsych Open. 2020 Dec 2;7(1):e2. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.123.
7
Repeat Self-Harm Following Hospital-Presenting Intentional Drug Overdose among Young People-A National Registry Study.重复自伤行为与年轻人因故意药物过量而住院之间的关系:一项全国登记研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 25;17(17):6159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176159.
8
Predicting future self-harm or suicide in adolescents: a systematic review of risk assessment scales/tools.预测青少年未来的自我伤害或自杀行为:风险评估量表/工具的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e029311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029311.
9
Predicting repeated self-harm or suicide in adolescents and young adults using risk assessment scales/tools: a systematic review protocol.使用风险评估量表/工具预测青少年和年轻成年人的重复自残或自杀:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 4;8(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1007-7.
10
Accuracy of risk scales for predicting repeat self-harm and suicide: a multicentre, population-level cohort study using routine clinical data.风险量表预测重复自伤和自杀的准确性:一项使用常规临床数据的多中心、人群水平队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 25;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1693-z.