• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

救护车到达对急诊科待诊时间的影响。

Influence of ambulance arrival on emergency department time to be seen.

作者信息

Richards Michael E, Hubble Michael W, Crandall Cameron

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):440-6. doi: 10.1080/10903120600725868.

DOI:10.1080/10903120600725868
PMID:16997771
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

For a limited number of presenting complaints, arrival by ambulance has been shown in some emergency departments to decrease time to be seen by a physician. We sought to determine if this time advantage could be demonstrated as a national trend over a variety of presenting complaints.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was performed on the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a national probability sample of emergency department visits. To compare waiting times between patients arriving by ambulance and those arriving by walk-in, a survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Primary variables of interest were mode of arrival, waiting time to see physician, and immediacy to be seen (triage category). The weighted values were utilized to produce national estimates. Patients who left without being seen were treated as right censored data.

RESULTS

A total of 61,130 records, weighted to represent 268.3 million emergency department visits from 1997 to 2000, were included in the analysis. Patients arrived by ambulance in 14.4% of these cases. Median wait time for patients arriving by ambulance was 14.1 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3 to 34.2) as compared with 26.0 minutes (95% CI, 11.5 to 55.1) for patients who arrived by walk-in. In the multivariate analysis, arrival by ambulance offered a 25.0% (95% CI, 19.0% to 31.6%) time advantage over walk-in and a 40.8% (95% CI, 23.5% to 58.7%) time advantage over arrival by public service.

CONCLUSIONS

Arrival by ambulance offered a time to be seen advantage for a broad range of presenting complaints in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey across all triage categories.

摘要

目的

在一些急诊科,对于少数就诊主诉,已表明救护车送达可缩短患者等待医生诊疗的时间。我们试图确定这种时间优势是否能作为各种就诊主诉的全国性趋势得到证实。

方法

对国家医院门诊医疗调查进行了二次分析,该调查是对急诊科就诊情况的全国概率抽样。为比较救护车送达患者与步行就诊患者的等待时间,使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型进行了生存分析。主要关注变量为到达方式、等待医生诊疗时间以及即刻诊疗情况(分诊类别)。利用加权值得出全国估计数。未就诊即离开的患者被视为截尾数据。

结果

分析纳入了总共61130条记录,加权后代表1997年至2000年的2.683亿次急诊科就诊。其中14.4%的病例患者由救护车送达。救护车送达患者的中位等待时间为14.1分钟(95%置信区间[CI],4.3至34.2),而步行就诊患者的中位等待时间为26.0分钟(95%CI,11.5至55.1)。在多变量分析中,与步行就诊相比,救护车送达具有25.0%(95%CI,19.0%至31.6%)的时间优势,与公共服务送达相比具有40.8%(95%CI,23.5%至58.7%)的时间优势。

结论

在国家医院门诊医疗调查中,救护车送达在所有分诊类别下对于广泛的就诊主诉都具有等待诊疗时间优势。

相似文献

1
Influence of ambulance arrival on emergency department time to be seen.救护车到达对急诊科待诊时间的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):440-6. doi: 10.1080/10903120600725868.
2
Clinical and economic factors associated with ambulance use to the emergency department.与使用救护车前往急诊科相关的临床和经济因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):879-85. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
3
Electrocardiographic recording and timeliness of clinician evaluation in the emergency department in patients presenting with chest pain.胸痛患者在急诊科的心电图记录及临床医生评估的及时性。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 15;99(8):1115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.023. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
4
"Left without being seen": a national profile of children who leave the emergency department before evaluation.“未被诊治便离开”:对在评估前离开急诊科的儿童的全国性概况分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 May 1.
5
Analysis of ambulance transports and diversions among US emergency departments.美国急诊科救护车转运与分流情况分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;47(4):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
6
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2004年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2006 Jun 23(372):1-29.
7
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗调查:2005年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(386):1-32.
8
Factors associated with ambulance use among patients with low-acuity conditions.与低危急症患者使用救护车相关的因素。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):329-37. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.670688. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
9
At-risk populations and the critically ill rely disproportionately on ambulance transport to emergency departments.高危人群和重症患者不成比例地依赖救护车将他们送往急诊部门。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
10
Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis.急诊科导致救护车分流的因素:一项定量分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):467-76. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.23.

引用本文的文献

1
Serious conditions among conveyed and non-conveyed patients presenting with nonspecific chief complaints to the ambulance service.转运和非转运患者因非特异性主诉向救护车服务就诊的严重情况。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01106-7.
2
Effect of prehospital transportation on 24-h fluid volume, a analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study on fluid volumes in patients with suspected infection.院前转运对24小时液体量的影响:一项关于疑似感染患者液体量的多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 21;9:1052071. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1052071. eCollection 2022.
3
Serious conditions among patients with non-specific chief complaints in the pre-hospital setting: a retrospective cohort study.
院前以非特异性主诉就诊患者中严重病情的回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 29;28(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00767-0.
4
Children's Mental Health Visits to the Emergency Department: Factors Affecting Wait Times and Length of Stay.儿童心理健康急诊就诊:影响等待时间和住院时长的因素
Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:897904. doi: 10.1155/2014/897904. Epub 2014 Jan 19.