Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
Emergency department (ED) crowding increases ambulance diversion. Ambulance diversion disproportionately affects individuals who rely on ambulance transport. The purpose of this study is to determine which populations rely most on ambulance transport.
We queried the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database for 1997 to 2000 and 2003 to 2005 for patients who arrived by ambulance or personal transport. We performed bivariate analysis to assess the extent to which all patients and a subset of critically ill patients use ambulance transport relative to self-transport.
In our sample, 30,455 (15%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 15% to 16%) patients arrived by ambulance and 162,091 (85%; 95% CI 84% to 85%) arrived by walk-in/self-transport. Overall, patients with Medicare insurance were more likely to rely on ambulance transport, at 34% (95% CI 33% to 35%), than the privately insured, at 11% (95% CI 10% to 11%). Among the critically ill, privately insured patients were less likely to rely on ambulance transport, at 47% (95% CI 42% to 52%), than those with Medicare insurance (61%; 95% CI 58% to 65%), the publicly insured (60%; 95% CI 52% to 67%), or the uninsured (57%; 95% CI 49% to 64%). Among the critically ill, patients aged 15 to 24 years and those older than 74 years were most likely to rely on ambulance transport, at 63% (95% CI 53% to 72%) and 67% (95% CI 62% to 71%), respectively. Fifty-seven percent (95% CI 54% to 59%) of the critically ill used ambulance versus 15% (95% CI 14% to 15%) of noncritical patients.
Patients with Medicare insurance or public insurance, the uninsured, the elderly, and the critically ill disproportionately rely on ambulance transport to the ED. Ambulance diversion may disproportionately affect these populations.
急诊科(ED)拥挤会增加救护车转院。救护车转院不成比例地影响到依赖救护车转运的人群。本研究的目的是确定哪些人群最依赖救护车转运。
我们对 1997 年至 2000 年和 2003 年至 2005 年全国医院门诊医疗调查数据库进行了查询,以获取通过救护车或私人交通工具到达的患者。我们进行了双变量分析,以评估所有患者和一组危重症患者相对于自行转运,使用救护车转运的程度。
在我们的样本中,30455 名(15%;95%置信区间[CI]15%至 16%)患者通过救护车到达,162091 名(85%;95%CI 84%至 85%)通过步行/自行到达。总体而言,医疗保险患者更有可能依赖救护车转运,占 34%(95%CI 33%至 35%),而私人保险患者占 11%(95%CI 10%至 11%)。在危重症患者中,私人保险患者依赖救护车转运的可能性较小,为 47%(95%CI 42%至 52%),而医疗保险患者为 61%(95%CI 58%至 65%),公共保险患者为 60%(95%CI 52%至 67%),无保险患者为 57%(95%CI 49%至 64%)。在危重症患者中,15 至 24 岁和 74 岁以上的患者最有可能依赖救护车转运,分别为 63%(95%CI 53%至 72%)和 67%(95%CI 62%至 71%)。57%(95%CI 54%至 59%)的危重症患者使用救护车,而非危重症患者为 15%(95%CI 14%至 15%)。
医疗保险或公共保险、无保险、老年人和危重症患者不成比例地依赖救护车转运至急诊科。救护车转院可能不成比例地影响这些人群。