Bloom Lynn F, Lapierre Nathalie M, Wilson Keith G, Curran Dorothyann, DeForge Daniel A, Blackmer Jeff
The Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Oct;85(10):807-13. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000237871.91829.30.
To determine the concordance between patients with multiple sclerosis and their clinical team members on the identification of goals for an inpatient rehabilitation stay.
Prospective cohort study of patients admitted for rehabilitation in an adult inpatient neurospinal unit at a Rehabilitation Centre in Ottawa, Canada. Twenty-seven patients (11 men and 16 women, mean age of 45.3 yrs) with either a laboratory or a clinically supported diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Patients rated 55 goals from a preexisting list, indicating the importance of each goal to be addressed during the inpatient stay. The goals fell into five broad domains of health/medical issues, daily activities, mobility, community life, and personal well-being. Patients also identified their five most important individual goals. In a separate session, the clinical team also rated the 55 goals in relation to each patient and identified an independent list of the five most important rehabilitation goals. Main outcome measures included concordance between patient and team ratings in the identification of goals, ratings of the likelihood of success of achieving each goal, and ratings of the amount of change required to realize a minimal clinically important difference.
The patients and the team agreed on an average of 1.7 of the patient's five top-rated goals. Compared with the team, patients gave higher importance ratings to goals within the health/medical, mobility, and daily activities domains. They also considered that a greater average improvement would be required to achieve a meaningful benefit, and they gave higher ratings of the likelihood of success in achieving their selected goals.
Patients with multiple sclerosis and clinical team members do not necessarily agree on specific goals for a rehabilitation stay. Patients may also have greater expectations than clinicians with respect to the amount of improvement and the likelihood of achieving their goals.
确定多发性硬化症患者与其临床团队成员在确定住院康复目标方面的一致性。
对加拿大渥太华一家康复中心成人住院神经脊髓科收治的康复患者进行前瞻性队列研究。27例患者(11例男性和16例女性,平均年龄45.3岁),其多发性硬化症诊断有实验室依据或临床支持。患者对预先列出的55个目标进行评分,表明每个目标在住院期间需要解决的重要性。这些目标分为健康/医疗问题、日常活动、移动性、社区生活和个人幸福感五个广泛领域。患者还确定了他们最重要的五个个人目标。在另一次会议中,临床团队也对与每位患者相关的55个目标进行了评分,并确定了一份独立的五个最重要康复目标清单。主要结局指标包括患者和团队在目标确定方面的评分一致性、实现每个目标成功可能性的评分以及实现最小临床重要差异所需变化量的评分。
患者和团队平均就患者五个最高评分目标中的1.7个达成一致。与团队相比,患者对健康/医疗、移动性和日常活动领域内的目标给予了更高的重要性评分。他们还认为实现有意义的益处需要更大的平均改善,并且他们对实现所选目标成功可能性的评分更高。
多发性硬化症患者和临床团队成员在康复住院的具体目标上不一定达成一致。在改善程度和实现目标的可能性方面,患者的期望可能也比临床医生更高。