个人自由与集体责任：一位伦理学家的视角
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an ethicist's perspective.
作者信息
Ashcroft Richard E
出版信息
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 25;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-11.
Abstract
Philosophical theories of collective action have produced a number of alternative accounts of the rationality and morality of self-interest and altruism. These have obvious applications to communicable disease control, the avoidance of antibiotic resistance, the responsibility of healthcare professionals to patients with serious communicable diseases, and the sharing of personal data in epidemiological research.
摘要
集体行动的哲学理论产生了许多关于自我利益和利他主义的合理性与道德性的不同解释。这些解释在传染病控制、避免抗生素耐药性、医护人员对患有严重传染病患者的责任以及流行病学研究中的个人数据共享等方面有着明显的应用。
相似文献
1
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an ethicist's perspective.个人自由与集体责任：一位伦理学家的视角
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 25;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-11.
2
Geographies of responsibility.责任的地域分布
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;27(1):38-44.
3
The morality of surrogate mothering.代孕的道德问题。
South J Philos. 1989 Fall;27(3):361-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1989.tb00495.x.
4
An ethicist's commentary on the morality of increased salaries for veterinarians.一位伦理学家对提高兽医薪资的道德性的评论。
Can Vet J. 2004 Dec;45(12):975.
5
An ethicist's commentary on sharing new prevention and treatment regimens.一位伦理学家对分享新的预防和治疗方案的评论。
Can Vet J. 2003 Jan;44(1):11-2.
6
Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism.关于自由和责任的判断是否取决于你是谁？关于相容论和不相容论直觉的人格差异。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
7
Natural resources for morality: commentary.道德的自然资源：评论
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):92-5.
8
Taking responsibility: toward an understanding of morality in practice: a critical review of the empirical and selected philosophical literature on the social organization of responsibility.承担责任：走向对实践中道德的理解：对关于责任社会组织的实证及部分哲学文献的批判性综述。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2006 Apr-Jun;29(2):E56-73. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200604000-00016.
9
An ethicist's commentary on increased cost of proper shipping.一位伦理学家对适当运输成本增加的评论。
Can Vet J. 2007 Feb;48(2):126.
10
An ethicist's commentary on antibiotic use.一位伦理学家对抗生素使用的评论。
Can Vet J. 2004 May;45(5):379.
引用本文的文献
1
Proscriptive Injunctions Can Elicit Greater Reactance and Lower Legitimacy Perceptions Than Prescriptive Injunctions.与指令性禁令相比，禁止性禁令可能会引发更大的抵触情绪，并降低人们对其合法性的认知。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 May;48(5):676-689. doi: 10.1177/01461672211021310. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
European citizens' opinions on immunisation.欧洲公民对免疫接种的看法。
Vaccine. 2008 Jan 17;26(3):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
3
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: too many rights make a wrong?
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Oct 2;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-14.
本文引用的文献
1
Going smoke-free: the medical case for clean air in the home, at work and in public places.实现无烟环境：关于家庭、工作场所和公共场所清洁空气的医学依据。
Clin Med (Lond). 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):548-50. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-6-548.
Zotero 插件