• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲公民对免疫接种的看法。

European citizens' opinions on immunisation.

作者信息

Moran Nicola, Shickle Darren, Richardson Erica

机构信息

Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2008 Jan 17;26(3):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.001
PMID:18093700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7131435/
Abstract

As part of a larger study exploring how European citizens' balance issues of public and private interest and the extent to which they are prepared to accept State intervention on a range of public health issues, focus group participants were asked whether childhood immunisation should be a matter of parental choice or State compulsion. The question was debated in 66 (of 96) focus groups held across 16 European countries in 2003. Discussions focused on the concept of risk, trust in health professionals and the State, upholding the status quo, fears over vaccine safety and perceptions of infectious disease as a 'foreign threat'.

摘要

作为一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究旨在探讨欧洲公民如何权衡公共利益和私人利益,以及他们在一系列公共卫生问题上愿意接受国家干预的程度,焦点小组参与者被问及儿童免疫接种应该是父母的选择还是国家强制行为。2003年,在16个欧洲国家举行的96个焦点小组中,有66个讨论了这个问题。讨论集中在风险概念、对医疗专业人员和国家的信任、维持现状、对疫苗安全的担忧以及将传染病视为“外来威胁”的认知上。

相似文献

1
European citizens' opinions on immunisation.欧洲公民对免疫接种的看法。
Vaccine. 2008 Jan 17;26(3):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
2
Parents' perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study.父母对麻腮风三联疫苗免疫接种的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):904-10.
3
Exploring parents' reasons for incomplete childhood immunisation in Indonesia.探讨印度尼西亚父母未完成儿童免疫接种的原因。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 8;37(43):6486-6493. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.081. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Parents' difficulties with decisions about childhood immunisation.父母在儿童免疫接种决策方面的困难。
Community Pract. 2008 Oct;81(10):32-5.
5
European citizens' opinions on water fluoridation.欧洲公民对水氟化的看法。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;36(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00373.x.
6
Immunizing Children: A Qualitative Analysis of Future Parental Decision Making.为儿童接种疫苗:对未来父母决策的定性分析
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Oct;56(11):1032-1039. doi: 10.1177/0009922817701173. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Protecting public trust in immunization.保护公众对免疫接种的信任。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):149-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0987.
8
Choosing not to immunize: are parents making informed decisions?选择不进行免疫接种:家长们做出的是明智的决定吗?
Fam Pract. 2001 Apr;18(2):181-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.2.181.
9
Deciding on cystic fibrosis carrier screening: three citizens' juries and an online survey.决定囊性纤维化携带者筛查:三个公民陪审团和一项在线调查。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Oct 1;28(5):973-977. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky032.
10
From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.从被动参与者到积极推动者:公民陪审团在护理研究中的潜力。
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Oct;27(7):788-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
European citizens' opinions on water fluoridation.欧洲公民对水氟化的看法。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;36(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00373.x.
2
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: too many rights make a wrong?个人自由与集体责任:权利过多会酿成错误吗?
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Oct 2;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-14.
3
Individual freedoms versus collective responsibility: immunization decision-making in the face of occasionally competing values.个人自由与集体责任:面对偶尔相互冲突的价值观时的免疫接种决策
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 27;3:13. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-13.
4
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective.个人自由与集体责任:经济流行病学视角
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 26;3:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-12.
5
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an ethicist's perspective.个人自由与集体责任:一位伦理学家的视角
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 25;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-11.
6
An internet-based survey on parental attitudes towards immunization.一项关于家长对免疫接种态度的网络调查。
Vaccine. 2006 Sep 11;24(37-39):6351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.029. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
7
Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust.母亲关于婴儿疫苗接种决策的定性分析:信任的重要性。
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1532-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1728.
8
'Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body's immune system': parental concerns about vaccine 'overload' and 'immune-vulnerability'.联合疫苗对人体免疫系统而言犹如一场突然袭击:家长对疫苗“过载”和“免疫脆弱性”的担忧。
Vaccine. 2006 May 15;24(20):4321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
9
Compulsory vaccination and conscientious or philosophical exemptions: past, present, and future.强制接种疫苗以及出于良心或哲学原因的豁免:过去、现在和未来。
Lancet. 2006 Feb 4;367(9508):436-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68144-0.
10
Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination.对探索父母对儿童疫苗接种的信念和态度的定性研究进行的系统评价确定了疫苗接种的常见障碍。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;58(11):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.002.