Dyck Peter J, Davies Jenny L, Clark Vicki M, Litchy William J, Dyck P James B, Klein Christopher J, Rizza Robert A, Pach John M, Klein Ronald, Larson Timothy S, Melton L Joseph, O'Brien Peter C
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2006 Oct;29(10):2282-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0525.
The degree to which chronic glycemic exposure (CGE) (fasting plasma glucose [FPG], HbA1c [A1C], duration of diabetes, age at onset of diabetes, or combinations of these) is associated with or predicts the severity of microvessel complications is unsettled. Specifically, we test whether combinations of components correlate and predict complications better than individual components.
Correlations and predictions of CGE and complications were assessed in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study, a population-based, cross-sectional, and longitudinal epidemiologic survey of 504 patients with diabetes followed for up to 20 years.
In multivariate analysis, A1C and duration of diabetes (and to a lesser degree age at onset of diabetes but not FPG) were the main significant CGE risk covariates for complications. A derived glycemic exposure index (GE(i)) correlated with and predicted complications better than did individual components. Composite or staged measures of polyneuropathy provided higher correlations and better predictions than did dichotomous measures of whether polyneuropathy was present or not. Generally, the mean GE(i) was significantly higher with increasing stages of severity of complications.
A combination of A1C, duration of diabetes, and age at onset of diabetes (a mathematical index, GE(i)) correlates significantly with complications and predicts later complications better than single components of CGE. Serial measures of A1C improved the correlations and predictions. For polyneuropathy, continuous or staged measurements performed better than dichotomous judgments. Even with intensive assessment of CGE and complications over long times, only about one-third of the variability of the severity of complications is explained, emphasizing the role of other putative risk covariates.
慢性血糖暴露(CGE)(空腹血糖[FPG]、糖化血红蛋白[A1C]、糖尿病病程、糖尿病发病年龄或这些因素的组合)与微血管并发症严重程度的关联程度或对其的预测作用尚无定论。具体而言,我们测试CGE各组成部分的组合是否比单个组成部分能更好地关联并预测并发症。
在罗切斯特糖尿病神经病变研究中评估CGE与并发症之间的相关性及预测情况,该研究是一项基于人群的横断面和纵向流行病学调查,对504例糖尿病患者进行了长达20年的随访。
在多变量分析中,A1C和糖尿病病程(以及在较小程度上糖尿病发病年龄,但不是FPG)是并发症的主要显著CGE风险协变量。一个衍生的血糖暴露指数(GE(i))与并发症的相关性及预测能力优于单个组成部分。与单纯判断是否存在多发性神经病变的二分法测量相比,多发性神经病变的综合或分期测量具有更高的相关性和更好的预测能力。一般来说,随着并发症严重程度阶段的增加,平均GE(i)显著升高。
A1C、糖尿病病程和糖尿病发病年龄的组合(一个数学指数,GE(i))与并发症显著相关,并且比CGE的单个组成部分能更好地预测后期并发症。连续测量A1C可改善相关性和预测能力。对于多发性神经病变,连续或分期测量比二分法判断表现更好。即使对CGE和并发症进行长时间的密集评估,也只能解释约三分之一的并发症严重程度变异性,这强调了其他假定风险协变量的作用。