Wang Yu-Chih, Ko Ellen Wen-Ching, Huang Chiung-Shing, Chen Yu-Ray
Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Sep;17(5):898-904. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000234985.99863.97.
The purposes of the present investigation were to: 1)locate the instantaneous rotation center of mandible autorotation during maxillary surgical impaction; 2) identify the discrepancies between the resultant mandibular position following by maxillary surgical impaction and presurgical predictions, which use the radiographic condylar center as the rotation center for mandibular autorotation; and 3)find the interrelation between the magnitude of maxillary surgical impaction and the sagittal change of mandible. Ten patients underwent maxillary LeFort I impaction without concomitant major mandibular ramus split osteotomies were included. The preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) lateral cephalograms were used to evaluate the surgical changes and locate the center of rotation of mandibular autorotation with Reuleaux method. Prediction errors were measured by comparing the predicted (Tp) and postoperative (T1) cephalometric tracings. The magnitude of the maxillary surgical impaction was compared to the positional changes of mandible after mandibular autorotation with correlation and regression analysis. The results demonstrated that the centers of mandibular autorotation located 2.5 mm behind and 19.6 mm below the radiographic condylar center of the mandible in average with large individual variations. By using the radiographic condylar center of the mandible to predict the mandibular autorotation would overestimate the horizontal position of chin by 2 mm and underestimate the vertical position of chin by 1.3 mm following an average of 5 mm surgical maxillary impaction. The magnitude of maxillary impaction was highly and positively correlated to the horizontal displacement of chin position. The rotation centers of mandibular autorotation following by maxillary LeFort I impaction osteotomies might not usually locate at the radiographic condylar center of the mandible also with large individual variations in their positions. Surgeons and orthodontists should be aware of the horizontal and vertical discrepancies of chin positions while planning a two-jaw surgery by using the radiographic center of mandibular condyle as the rotation center in mandibular autorotation.
1)确定上颌手术垂直截骨术中下颌自动旋转的瞬时旋转中心;2)识别上颌手术垂直截骨术后下颌最终位置与术前预测值之间的差异,术前预测是以影像学髁突中心作为下颌自动旋转的旋转中心;3)找出上颌手术垂直截骨的幅度与下颌矢状面变化之间的相互关系。纳入了10例接受上颌LeFort I型垂直截骨术且未同时进行下颌升支劈开截骨术的患者。利用术前(T0)和术后(T1)的头颅侧位片评估手术变化,并采用勒洛三角形法确定下颌自动旋转的旋转中心。通过比较预测的(Tp)和术后(T1)的头影测量描记图来测量预测误差。采用相关性和回归分析比较上颌手术垂直截骨的幅度与下颌自动旋转后下颌位置的变化。结果表明,下颌自动旋转中心平均位于下颌影像学髁突中心后方2.5 mm及下方19.6 mm处,个体差异较大。在上颌平均垂直截骨5 mm后,以下颌影像学髁突中心预测下颌自动旋转会使颏部水平位置高估2 mm,垂直位置低估1.3 mm。上颌垂直截骨的幅度与颏部位置的水平位移高度正相关。上颌LeFort I型垂直截骨术后下颌自动旋转的旋转中心通常可能并不位于下颌影像学髁突中心,其位置个体差异也较大。外科医生和正畸医生在计划双颌手术时,以下颌髁突影像学中心作为下颌自动旋转的旋转中心时,应意识到颏部位置的水平和垂直差异。