Suppr超能文献

将技术用作早产儿临床护理评估工具

Use of technology as an evaluation tool of clinical care in preterm newborns.

作者信息

Mendes Izabel, Carvalho Manoel de, Almeida Rosimary Terezinha, Moreira Maria Elizabeth

机构信息

Instituto Fernandes Figueira (IFF), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006 Sep-Oct;82(5):371-6. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1535. Epub 2006 Sep 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of the Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (NTISS) as a tool to quantify the use of technology in neonatal intensive care units, in order to detect discrepancies in the care provided to high-risk newborn infants.

METHODS

Prospective, descriptive, observational study about the use of technology in two neonatal intensive care units (one public and one private). The NTISS was calculated on a daily basis up to the discharge or death of preterm newborns with gestational age equal to or less than 32 weeks. We gathered data about prenatal clinical conditions, birth characteristics, and conditions on admission to the intensive care unit, as well as about the morbidities developed during the hospital stay. The risks of preterm newborns were adjusted by means of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology, Perinatal Extension, Version II (SNAPPE-II). Student's t test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon's test were used for the descriptive analysis. The study was approved by the local Research and Ethics Committee.

RESULTS

We assessed 44 newborn infants from the public intensive care unit and 52 from the private one. On admission, the severity score (SNAPPE-II) and the overall NTISS were statistically similar in both care units. The curve for the use of technology showed a gradual and progressive decreasing pattern in both care units up to the 31st day. Thereafter, there was a continuous downward trend in the private care unit, but a significant increase in the overall NTISS in the public care unit. The patients from the public care unit developed more morbidities than those from the private unit.

CONCLUSION

Patients with similar clinical pictures can be treated with different levels of technological resources. This may have a direct impact on morbidities and on healthcare costs. The NTISS allowed monitoring healthcare and proved efficient in detecting discrepancies in practices that could influence clinical outcomes and operating costs.

摘要

目的

评估新生儿治疗干预评分系统(NTISS)作为量化新生儿重症监护病房技术使用情况的工具,以发现高危新生儿护理中存在的差异。

方法

对两家新生儿重症监护病房(一家公立,一家私立)的技术使用情况进行前瞻性、描述性观察研究。对胎龄小于或等于32周的早产儿,每天计算NTISS,直至出院或死亡。我们收集了产前临床状况、出生特征、重症监护病房入院时的状况以及住院期间发生的疾病的数据。通过新生儿急性生理学及围生期扩展评分系统第二版(SNAPPE-II)对早产儿的风险进行调整。采用学生t检验、卡方检验、Fisher精确检验以及Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon检验进行描述性分析。该研究获得当地研究与伦理委员会批准。

结果

我们评估了公立重症监护病房的44名新生儿和私立重症监护病房的52名新生儿。入院时,两个监护病房的严重程度评分(SNAPPE-II)和总体NTISS在统计学上相似。技术使用曲线在两个监护病房直至第31天均呈现逐渐下降的趋势。此后,私立监护病房持续下降,但公立监护病房的总体NTISS显著增加。公立监护病房的患者比私立监护病房的患者发生更多疾病。

结论

具有相似临床表现的患者可采用不同水平的技术资源进行治疗。这可能对疾病发生率和医疗成本产生直接影响。NTISS有助于监测医疗护理情况,并在发现可能影响临床结局和运营成本的实践差异方面证明是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验