Weinstock Jeremiah, Alessi Sheila M, Petry Nancy M
University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3944, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Mar 16;87(2-3):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.08.027. Epub 2006 Sep 26.
The relationship between psychiatric severity and substance use disorders treatment outcome was assessed in 393 individuals who received either standard treatment or standard treatment plus contingency management. The sample was divided into groups of low, moderate, and high psychiatric severity based upon baseline Addiction Severity Index psychiatric composite scores. Participants in the high psychiatric severity group reported a greater prevalence of psychiatric hospitalization, psychiatric medications, and suicide attempts, as well as poorer baseline psychosocial functioning. In terms of treatment outcome, a significant interaction between psychiatric severity and treatment modality was found in relation to treatment retention. Participants in the standard treatment condition were more likely to dropout of treatment earlier as psychiatric severity increased, while retention was similar across the psychiatric severity groups in the contingency management condition. Psychiatric severity was not linked to longest duration of abstinence achieved during treatment or adherence with contingency management procedures. Overall, these findings suggest contingency management is an efficacious and appropriate intervention for substance use disordered individuals across a range of psychiatric problems.
在393名接受标准治疗或标准治疗加应急管理的个体中,评估了精神疾病严重程度与物质使用障碍治疗结果之间的关系。根据基线成瘾严重程度指数精神综合评分,将样本分为低、中、高精神疾病严重程度组。高精神疾病严重程度组的参与者报告说,精神科住院、精神科药物治疗和自杀未遂的发生率更高,同时基线心理社会功能也更差。在治疗结果方面,发现精神疾病严重程度与治疗方式之间在治疗留存率方面存在显著交互作用。在标准治疗条件下,随着精神疾病严重程度的增加,参与者更早退出治疗的可能性更大,而在应急管理条件下,各精神疾病严重程度组的留存率相似。精神疾病严重程度与治疗期间实现的最长禁欲时间或对应急管理程序的依从性无关。总体而言,这些发现表明,应急管理是对一系列精神问题的物质使用障碍个体的一种有效且合适的干预措施。