Annamalai Padmanaban, Rao A L N
Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0122, USA.
J Virol. 2006 Oct;80(20):10096-108. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01186-06.
In Brome mosaic virus (BMV), genomic RNA1 (gB1) and RNA2 (gB2), encoding the replication factors, are packaged into two separate virions, whereas genomic RNA3 (gB3) and its subgenomic coat protein (CP) mRNA (sgB4) are copackaged into a third virion. In vitro assembly assays performed between a series of deletion variants of sgB4 and wild-type (wt) CP subunits demonstrated that packaging of sgB4 is independent of sequences encoding the CP open reading frame. To confirm these observations in vivo and to unravel the mechanism of sgB4 copackaging, an Agrobacterium-mediated transient in vivo expression system (P. Annamalai and A. L. N. Rao, Virology 338:96-111, 2005) that effectively uncouples replication from packaging was used. Cultures of agrotransformants, engineered to express sgB4 and CP subunits either transiently (sgB4(Trans) and CP(Trans)) or in replication-dependent transcription and translation when complemented with gB1 and gB2 (sgB4(Rep) and CP(Rep)), were mixed in all four pair-wise combinations and infiltrated to Nicotiana benthamiana leaves to systematically evaluate requirements regulating sgB4 packaging. The data revealed that (i) in the absence of replication, packaging was nonspecific, since transiently expressed CP subunits efficiently packaged ubiquitous cellular RNA as well as transiently expressed sgB4 and its deletion variants; (ii) induction of viral replication increased specificity of RNA packaging; and most importantly, (iii) efficient packaging of sgB4, reminiscent of the wt scenario, is functionally coupled not only to its transcription via replication but also to translation of CP from replication-derived mRNA, a mechanism that appears to be conserved among positive-strand RNA viruses of plants (this study), animals (flock house virus), and humans (poliovirus).
在雀麦花叶病毒(BMV)中,编码复制因子的基因组RNA1(gB1)和RNA2(gB2)被包装进两种不同的病毒粒子中,而基因组RNA3(gB3)及其亚基因组外壳蛋白(CP)mRNA(sgB4)则被共同包装进第三种病毒粒子中。在一系列sgB4缺失变体与野生型(wt)CP亚基之间进行的体外组装试验表明,sgB4的包装独立于编码CP开放阅读框的序列。为了在体内证实这些观察结果并阐明sgB4共同包装的机制,使用了一种农杆菌介导的体内瞬时表达系统(P. 安纳马莱和A. L. N. 拉奥,《病毒学》338:96 - 111,2005年),该系统有效地将复制与包装分离开来。对经过基因工程改造的农杆菌转化体培养物进行处理,使其要么瞬时表达sgB4和CP亚基(sgB4(Trans)和CP(Trans)),要么在与gB1和gB2互补时以依赖复制的转录和翻译方式表达(sgB4(Rep)和CP(Rep)),将所有四种两两组合的培养物混合后浸润到本氏烟草叶片中,以系统地评估调控sgB4包装的条件。数据显示:(i)在没有复制的情况下,包装是非特异性的,因为瞬时表达的CP亚基能有效地包装普遍存在的细胞RNA以及瞬时表达的sgB4及其缺失变体;(ii)病毒复制的诱导增加了RNA包装的特异性;最重要的是,(iii)sgB4的有效包装类似于野生型情况,其功能不仅与通过复制进行的转录相关,还与从复制衍生的mRNA翻译CP相关,这种机制似乎在植物(本研究)、动物(禽舍病毒)和人类(脊髓灰质炎病毒)的正链RNA病毒中保守。