de Lima Margarida Maria Celeira, Sampaio Iracilda, Vieira Ricardo dos Santos, Schneider Horacio
Department of Genetics, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.
Primates. 2007 Jan;48(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s10329-006-0012-3. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
The taxonomic relationships among the four genera of the Atelidae family, Alouatta (Howler), Ateles (Spider), Lagothrix (Woolly) and Brachyteles (Muriqui), have been the subject of great debate. In general, almost all authors agree with the assignment of Howler monkeys as the basal genus, either in its own tribe Alouattini or in the subfamily Alouattinae, but they disagree on the associations among the other members of the family. Muriquis have been grouped with Spider monkeys based on the fact that they share various behavioral and morphological characteristics. Cladistic analyses using morphological, biochemical, karyotype and behavioral characteristics depicted a phylogenetic tree that places Howler as the basal genus and the remaining genera in an unresolved politomy. More recent studies using molecular data have suggested that Muriqui and Woolly monkeys are sister groups. However, a recent study based on nuclear and mtDNA argued that politomy is what best represents the relationships among Spider, Woolly and Muriqui. To contribute to this debate we have added new data from two nuclear genes, Transferrin and von Willebrand Factor, and using an alignment of 17,997 bp we demonstrate that a total analysis strongly supports the Muriqui-Woolly clade. A gene-to-gene approach showed that four of the eight nuclear genes provide support for the Muriqui-Woolly clade, two strongly and two moderately, while none of the eight genes provide support for any alternative arrangement. The mitochondrial genes were not able to resolve the politomy. A possible reason for the difficulty in resolving atelid relationships may be the short period of time separating each cladogenetic event in the evolutionary process that shaped this family.
蜘蛛猴科(Atelidae)的四个属,即吼猴属(Alouatta,吼猴)、蜘蛛猴属(Ateles,蜘蛛猴)、绒毛猴属(Lagothrix,绒毛猴)和绒毛蛛猴属(Brachyteles,绒毛蛛猴)之间的分类关系一直是激烈争论的主题。总体而言,几乎所有作者都认同将吼猴作为基部属,无论是在其自身的吼猴族(Alouattini)还是吼猴亚科(Alouattinae)中,但他们对于该科其他成员之间的关联存在分歧。绒毛蛛猴因与蜘蛛猴具有多种行为和形态特征而被归为一类。利用形态学、生物化学、核型和行为特征进行的分支系统分析描绘了一棵系统发育树,其中吼猴为基部属,其余属则处于未解决的多歧分支状态。最近使用分子数据的研究表明,绒毛蛛猴和绒毛猴是姐妹群。然而,一项基于核DNA和线粒体DNA的最新研究认为,多歧分支最能代表蜘蛛猴、绒毛猴和绒毛蛛猴之间的关系。为了对这场争论有所贡献,我们添加了来自两个核基因——转铁蛋白(Transferrin)和血管性血友病因子(von Willebrand Factor)的新数据,并通过对17,997个碱基对的比对,证明全面分析有力地支持绒毛蛛猴 -绒毛猴分支。逐个基因分析表明,八个核基因中有四个为绒毛蛛猴 -绒毛猴分支提供了支持,其中两个支持力度强,两个支持力度中等,而八个基因中没有一个为任何其他排列方式提供支持。线粒体基因无法解决多歧分支问题。难以解决蜘蛛猴科关系的一个可能原因可能是在塑造这个科的进化过程中,每次分支事件之间的时间间隔较短。