Wagers Scott S, Haverkamp Hans C, Bates Jason H T, Norton Ryan J, Thompson-Figueroa John A, Sullivan Michael J, Irvin Charles G
Vermont Lung Center, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont 05405, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jan;102(1):221-30. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01385.2005. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a defining feature of asthma. We have previously shown, in mice sensitized and challenged with antigen, that AHR is attributable to normal airway smooth muscle contraction with exaggerated airway closure. In the present study we sought to determine if the same was true for mice known to have intrinsic AHR, the genetic strain of mice, A/J. We found that A/J mice have AHR characterized by minimal increase in elastance following aerosolized methacholine challenge compared with mice (BALB/c) that have been antigen sensitized and challenged [concentration that evokes 50% change in elastance (PC(50)): 22.9 +/- 5.7 mg/ml for A/J vs. 3.3 +/- 0.4 mg/ml for antigen-challenged and -sensitized mice; P < 0.004]. Similar results were found when intravenous methacholine was used (PC(30) 0.22 +/- 0.08 mg/ml for A/J vs. 0.03 +/- 0.004 mg/ml for antigen-challenged and -sensitized mice). Computational model analysis revealed that the AHR in A/J mice is dominated by exaggerated airway smooth muscle contraction and that when the route of methacholine administration was changed to intravenous, central airway constriction dominates. Absorption atelectasis was used to provide evidence of the lack of airway closure in A/J mice. Bronchoconstriction during ventilation with 100% oxygen resulted in a mean 9.8% loss of visible lung area in A/J mice compared with 28% in antigen-sensitized and -challenged mice (P < 0.02). We conclude that the physiology of AHR depends on the mouse model used and the route of bronchial agonist administration.
气道高反应性(AHR)是哮喘的一个决定性特征。我们之前在经抗原致敏和激发的小鼠中发现,AHR 可归因于气道平滑肌正常收缩伴气道过度关闭。在本研究中,我们试图确定对于已知具有内在 AHR 的小鼠品系 A/J 小鼠而言是否也是如此。我们发现,与经抗原致敏和激发的小鼠(BALB/c 小鼠)相比,A/J 小鼠的 AHR 表现为雾化吸入乙酰甲胆碱激发后弹性增加最小[引起弹性 50%变化的浓度(PC(50)):A/J 小鼠为 22.9±5.7 mg/ml,经抗原激发和致敏的小鼠为 3.3±0.4 mg/ml;P<0.004]。当使用静脉注射乙酰甲胆碱时也得到了类似结果(A/J 小鼠的 PC(30)为 0.22±0.08 mg/ml,经抗原激发和致敏的小鼠为 0.03±0.004 mg/ml)。计算模型分析显示,A/J 小鼠的 AHR 主要由气道平滑肌过度收缩主导,并且当乙酰甲胆碱给药途径改为静脉注射时,中央气道收缩起主导作用。采用吸收性肺不张来证明 A/J 小鼠不存在气道关闭。与经抗原致敏和激发的小鼠中 28%的可见肺面积损失相比,A/J 小鼠在 100%氧气通气期间支气管收缩导致平均 9.8%的可见肺面积损失(P<0.02)。我们得出结论,AHR 的生理机制取决于所使用的小鼠模型和支气管激动剂的给药途径。