Suppr超能文献

人工耳蜗植入患者的翻修手术:45例病例回顾

Revision surgeries in cochlear implant patients: a review of 45 cases.

作者信息

Migirov Lela, Taitelbaum-Swead Riki, Hildesheimer Minka, Kronenberg Jona

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, 5262l, Israel.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jan;264(1):3-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0144-5. Epub 2006 Sep 29.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the causes for revision procedures, surgical findings and audiological outcome in reoperated cochlear implant patients. The medical records of 45 patients were reviewed retrospectively for age at the time of implantation, the implant was used for initial and revision surgeries, the duration of implant use before revision, surgical findings, and postoperative audiological results. Generally, children were reoperated more often than adults (12.5 vs. 6.9%) and, with one exception of improper electrode insertion, there were no major post-revision complications. Device failure (DF) was the main cause for revision surgery (23/45) followed by wound/flap problems, magnet/receiver-stimulator displacement, foreign body/allergic reaction, subperiosteal abscess, misplaced electrode, intractable vertigo, cholesteatoma and extrusion of the positioner. No significant difference was found in the rate of DF between children and adults for each implant separately (P = 0.289 for Nucleus 22, P = 0.355 for Nucleus 24, P = 0.683 for Clarion and P = 1.0 for Med-El). The failure rates of different implants did not differed significantly among adults. DF in the Clarion group was significantly higher compared to the Nucleus and Med-El combined for pediatric patients (P = 0.0218) and all CI recipients (adults + children; P = 0.0055). The post-revision audiological benefit was unchanged or improved compared to the initial implantation values in all reimplanted patients and was not influenced by minor surgical procedures (wound revision, drainage of any collection, magnet replacement, or relocation of receiver-stimulator). Since DF was found to be the most common cause for reoperation, improving device technology could prevent the vast majority of revision procedures.

摘要

本研究旨在分析再次接受人工耳蜗植入手术患者的翻修手术原因、手术发现及听力学结果。回顾性分析45例患者的病历,记录植入时年龄、初次及翻修手术所使用的植入体、翻修前植入体使用时长、手术发现及术后听力学结果。一般而言,儿童比成人更常接受再次手术(12.5%对6.9%),除电极插入不当外,翻修后无重大并发症。设备故障(DF)是翻修手术的主要原因(23/45),其次是伤口/皮瓣问题、磁铁/接收器-刺激器移位、异物/过敏反应、骨膜下脓肿、电极位置不当、顽固性眩晕、胆脂瘤及定位器脱出。单独分析每种植入体时,儿童与成人的DF发生率无显著差异(Nucleus 22为P = 0.289,Nucleus 24为P = 0.355,Clarion为P = 0.683,Med-El为P = 1.0)。不同植入体在成人中的故障率无显著差异。儿童患者中,Clarion组的DF发生率显著高于Nucleus和Med-El组之和(P = 0.0218),在所有人工耳蜗植入受者(成人+儿童)中也是如此(P = 0.0055)。与初次植入值相比,所有再次植入患者翻修后的听力学获益未变或有所改善,且不受小手术(伤口翻修、任何积液引流、磁铁更换或接收器-刺激器重新定位)影响。由于DF是再次手术最常见的原因,改进设备技术可预防绝大多数翻修手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验