• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在荷兰鹿特丹前列腺癌筛查试验(ERSPC)中,相隔四年的两轮后续筛查中的肿瘤特征及预后因素。

Tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in two subsequent screening rounds with four-year interval within prostate cancer screening trial, ERSPC Rotterdam.

作者信息

van der Cruijsen-Koeter Ingrid W, Roobol Monique J, Wildhagen Mark F, van der Kwast T H, Kirkels W J, Schröder Fritz H

机构信息

Department of Urology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3):615-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.015
PMID:17010732
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in screen-detected prostate cancers in two successive screening rounds with a 4-year screening interval in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2000, 42,376 men (21,210 in the screening arm and 21,166 in the control arm) were randomized and screened. Prostate-specific antigen testing, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and sextant biopsies were offered to the participants in the screening arm. A total of 1218 men with a biopsy indication at the first screening received an additional screening after 1 year (early recall). By 2004, all men had received their second screening. Interval carcinomas were defined as cancers detected during the screening interval and were identified by linkage with the Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

In the first round, 1014 prostate cancers were detected--24 in the men noncompliant to screening, 63 at the early recall screening, and 433 in the second round of screening. Also, 62 interval carcinomas were diagnosed. In the second screening round, the mean prostate-specific antigen value was lower (5.6 versus 11.1 ng/mL), advanced clinical stage T3-T4 was 7.1-fold less common, and 76.4% versus 61.5% of the biopsy Gleason scores were less than 7. In the first screening round, 13 regional and 9 distant metastases were detected; in the second round, 2 cases with distant metastasis were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a shift toward more favorable tumor characteristics was seen for the second round of screening. These results support the screening methods used and the interscreening interval of 4 years.

摘要

目的

在欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究鹿特丹分部中,评估连续两轮、筛查间隔为4年的筛查发现的前列腺癌的肿瘤特征和预后因素。

方法

1993年至2000年,42376名男性(筛查组21210名,对照组21166名)被随机分组并接受筛查。筛查组的参与者接受前列腺特异性抗原检测、直肠指检、经直肠超声检查和六分区活检。共有1218名在首次筛查时有活检指征的男性在1年后接受了额外筛查(早期召回)。到2004年,所有男性都接受了第二次筛查。间期癌定义为在筛查间隔期间发现的癌症,并通过与癌症登记处的关联来识别。

结果

在第一轮筛查中,检测到1014例前列腺癌——24例在未依从筛查的男性中,63例在早期召回筛查中,433例在第二轮筛查中。此外,诊断出62例间期癌。在第二轮筛查中,前列腺特异性抗原的平均数值较低(5.6对11.1 ng/mL),临床晚期T3 - T4的情况少见7.1倍,活检Gleason评分低于7分的比例为76.4%对61.5%。在第一轮筛查中,检测到13例区域转移和9例远处转移;在第二轮筛查中,发现2例远处转移病例。

结论

总体而言,第二轮筛查显示肿瘤特征向更有利的方向转变。这些结果支持所采用的筛查方法和4年的筛查间隔。

相似文献

1
Tumor characteristics and prognostic factors in two subsequent screening rounds with four-year interval within prostate cancer screening trial, ERSPC Rotterdam.在荷兰鹿特丹前列腺癌筛查试验(ERSPC)中,相隔四年的两轮后续筛查中的肿瘤特征及预后因素。
Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3):615-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.015.
2
Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)——鹿特丹分部的癌症检测与癌症特征。两轮筛查的比较。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.030. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
3
Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam.前列腺癌筛查中的间期癌:在哥德堡和鹿特丹进行的欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究中比较2年和4年的筛查间隔
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 5;99(17):1296-303. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm101. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
4
No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).对于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为4.0 ng/mL或更高的男性,初次六分区活检结果为阴性后,无需立即重复进行六分区活检(荷兰鹿特丹欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机对照试验)。
Urology. 2004 May;63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.12.042.
5
Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section rotterdam.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(鹿特丹部分)中经筛查发现与临床诊断的前列腺癌的比较
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):121-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162061.40533.0f.
6
Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC.对于血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平<3.0 ng/ml的男性,有必要检测出所有前列腺癌吗?前列腺癌预防试验(PCPT)活检结果与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)结局相关信息的比较
Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.048. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
7
Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM).低前列腺特异性抗原水平下的前列腺特异性抗原变化率作为前列腺癌筛查工具:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机对照研究(鹿特丹)第二轮筛查结果
Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.083.
8
Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam).在基于人群的筛查中,前列腺特异性抗原水平为1.0 ng/mL或更低的男性是否需要进行额外检测?(欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机对照试验,鹿特丹部分)
Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.046.
9
Potentially advanced malignancies detected by screening for prostate carcinoma after an interval of 4 years.在4年的间隔期后通过前列腺癌筛查检测出的潜在晚期恶性肿瘤。
Cancer. 2004 Mar 1;100(5):968-75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20048.
10
4-year prostate specific antigen progression and diagnosis of prostate cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(鹿特丹部分)中前列腺特异性抗原4年进展情况及前列腺癌诊断
J Urol. 2005 Aug;174(2):489-94; discussion 493-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000165568.76908.5c.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0 Testing Using First-Catch, Non-Digital Rectal Examination Urine.使用首次排尿、非直肠指诊尿液进行MyProstateScore 2.0检测的临床验证
J Urol. 2025 May;213(5):581-589. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004421. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.定义前列腺癌的显著与非显著的阈值。
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Aug;10(8):473-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.112. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
The impact of PSA testing frequency on prostate cancer incidence and treatment in older men.
PSA 检测频率对老年男性前列腺癌发病率和治疗的影响。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011 Dec;14(4):332-9. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2011.29. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
4
Randomized trials of prostate cancer screening.前列腺癌筛查的随机试验。
Rev Urol. 2009 Summer;11(3):179-80.
5
Treatment for PSA screen-detected prostate cancer: what are the options?前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查发现的前列腺癌的治疗方法:有哪些选择?
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009 Mar;6(3):132-4. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1297. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
6
[What do men between 50 and 70 know about the effectiveness, the benefits, and the risks of prostate cancer screening?].50到70岁的男性对前列腺癌筛查的有效性、益处和风险了解多少?
Aten Primaria. 2008 Jul;40(7):357-61. doi: 10.1157/13124129.