Zettler Michael L, Schiedek Doris, Bobertz Bernd
Baltic Sea Research Institute, Seestr. 15, D-18119 Rostock, Germany.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;55(1-6):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
The need to assess the environmental status of marine and coastal waters according to the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) encouraged the design of specific biotic indices to evaluate the response of benthic communities to human-induced changes in water quality. In the present study three of these indices, the traditional Shannon Wiener Index (H') and the more recently published AMBI (AZTI' Marine Biotic Index) and BQI (Benthic Quality Index), were tested along a salinity gradient in the southern Baltic Sea. The comparison of the three indices demonstrates that in the southern Baltic Sea the ecological quality (EcoQ) classification based on macrozoobenthic communities as indicator greatly depends on the biotic index chosen. We found a significant positive relation between species number, H', BQI and salinity resulting in EcoQ status of "Bad", "Poor" or "Moderate" in areas with a salinity value below 10 psu. The AMBI was less dependent on salinity but appear to partly overestimate the EcoQ status. Presently none of these biotic indices appear to be adjusted for application in a gradient system as given in the southern Baltic Sea. A potential approach describing how to overcome this limitation is discussed.
根据欧盟水框架指令(WFD)评估海洋和沿海水域环境状况的需求,促使人们设计特定的生物指数,以评估底栖生物群落对人为水质变化的响应。在本研究中,在波罗的海南部的盐度梯度上测试了其中三个指数,即传统的香农-维纳指数(H')以及最近发布的AMBI(AZTI海洋生物指数)和BQI(底栖生物质量指数)。这三个指数的比较表明,在波罗的海南部,基于大型底栖动物群落作为指标的生态质量(EcoQ)分类很大程度上取决于所选择的生物指数。我们发现物种数量、H'、BQI与盐度之间存在显著的正相关关系,在盐度值低于10 psu的区域,生态质量状况为“差”、“中等”或“一般”。AMBI对盐度的依赖性较小,但似乎部分高估了生态质量状况。目前,这些生物指数似乎都没有针对波罗的海南部这样的梯度系统进行调整。本文讨论了一种描述如何克服这一局限性的潜在方法。