Suppr超能文献

成品压力袜的界面压力和硬度:体内和体外测量的比较。

Interface pressure and stiffness of ready made compression stockings: comparison of in vivo and in vitro measurements.

作者信息

Partsch Hugo, Partsch Bernhard, Braun Walter

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Medical University, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Oct;44(4):809-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is unknown if the pressure values of compression stockings indicated by the producers correspond to the actual compression pressure exerted in vivo. This study compared pressure and stiffness of ready-made compression stockings (Venosan) of different classes, measured on the leg and by laboratory testing.

METHODS

This was an experimental study conducted in a textile laboratory of a company that manufactures compression stockings. Twelve legs from healthy volunteers were fitted with ready-made calf-length compression stockings of the European classes I, II and III. In addition, two class I stockings were applied over each other. The in vivo interface pressure was measured using the medical stocking tester (MST) in position B1, eight cm proximal to the inner ankle. Stiffness was defined by an increase of pressure due to an increase of stretch that reflects the elastic property of the textile and was assessed by measuring the difference of interface pressure between standing and supine position at B1. In the laboratory, the MST was used to check the pressure of these stockings on wooden leg models. Then circular slices were cut out from the stockings at the B1 level and stretched by a Zwick dynamometer in the transverse direction. Force/extension-curves were plotted, from which the pressure and stiffness of each individual stocking was calculated.

RESULTS

The pressure profile measured on four positions along the leg by MST showed a degressive gradient on the wooden model but not on the human leg due to the measuring geometry in the ankle region. Pressure values on the leg correspond to the in vitro measurements calculated from the force/extension-curve with a bias (difference of the means) of -2.1 and 4.1 mm Hg. In 95% of the subjects, the difference was between -10.1 and 5.8 mm Hg (Bland Altman plot). The correlation between in vivo and in vitro measurement was highly significant (P < .0001, Spearman correlation coefficient; r = .8161). In vivo and in vitro measurement shows an increase of stiffness with increasing compression classes. The highest values are found for two class I stockings applied over each other.

CONCLUSION

Pressure and stiffness can be measured in vivo, correlate well with laboratory findings, and should be used in future studies, especially when different compression devices are to be compared.

摘要

目的

生产商所标明的加压弹力袜的压力值是否与体内实际施加的压迫压力相符尚不清楚。本研究比较了不同等级的成品加压弹力袜(Venosan)在腿部测量的压力及硬度与实验室测试结果。

方法

这是一项在一家生产加压弹力袜的公司的纺织品实验室进行的实验研究。12名健康志愿者的腿部穿上了欧洲I级、II级和III级的成品小腿长度加压弹力袜。此外,将两双I级弹力袜叠穿。使用医用弹力袜测试仪(MST)在内踝近端8厘米处的B1位置测量体内界面压力。硬度定义为因拉伸增加导致的压力增加,这反映了纺织品的弹性特性,并通过测量B1位置站立和仰卧位之间的界面压力差来评估。在实验室中,使用MST检查这些弹力袜在木制腿部模型上的压力。然后在B1水平从弹力袜上切下圆形切片,并在横向方向上用Zwick测力计拉伸。绘制力/伸长曲线,从中计算出每只弹力袜的压力和硬度。

结果

MST在腿部四个位置测量的压力分布在木制模型上显示出递减梯度,但在人体腿部由于脚踝区域的测量几何形状而未显示。腿部的压力值与根据力/伸长曲线计算的体外测量值相对应,偏差(均值差异)为-2.1和4.1毫米汞柱。在95%的受试者中,差异在-10.1和5.8毫米汞柱之间(布兰德-奥特曼图)。体内和体外测量之间的相关性非常显著(P <.0001,斯皮尔曼相关系数;r =.8161)。体内和体外测量均显示硬度随压迫等级增加而增加。叠穿两双I级弹力袜时硬度值最高。

结论

压力和硬度可以在体内测量,与实验室结果相关性良好,应在未来研究中使用,特别是在比较不同压迫装置时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验