Suppr超能文献

多项选择题中题目编写缺陷的评估

Assessment of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions.

作者信息

Nedeau-Cayo Rosemarie, Laughlin Deborah, Rus Linda, Hall John

机构信息

Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007, USA.

出版信息

J Nurses Prof Dev. 2013 Mar-Apr;29(2):52-7; quiz E1-2. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e318286c2f1.

Abstract

This study evaluated the quality of multiple-choice questions used in a hospital's e-learning system. Constructing well-written questions is fraught with difficulty, and item-writing flaws are common. Study results revealed that most items contained flaws and were written at the knowledge/comprehension level. Few items had linked objectives, and no association was found between the presence of objectives and flaws. Recommendations include education for writing test questions.

摘要

本研究评估了一家医院电子学习系统中使用的多项选择题的质量。编写精心的问题充满困难,题目编写缺陷很常见。研究结果显示,大多数题目存在缺陷,且是按照知识/理解水平编写的。很少有题目有相关的目标,目标的存在与缺陷之间未发现关联。建议包括开展编写试题的培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验