Asplin Brent R, Flottemesch Thomas J, Gordon Bradley D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Regions Hospital, 640 Jackson Street, St. Paul, MN 55101, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;13(11):1109-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
Between 1993 and 2003, visits to U.S. emergency departments (EDs) increased by 26%, to a total of 114 million visits annually. At the same time, the number of U.S. EDs decreased by more than 400, and almost 200,000 inpatient hospital beds were taken out of service. In this context, the adequacy of daily surge capacity within the system is clearly an important issue. However, the research agenda on surge capacity thus far has focused primarily on large-scale disasters, such as pandemic influenza or a serious bioterrorism event. The concept of daily surge capacity and its relationship to the broader research agenda on patient flow is a relatively new area of investigation. In this article, the authors begin by describing the overlap between the research agendas on daily surge capacity and patient flow. Next, they propose two models that have potential applications for both daily surge capacity and hospitalwide patient-flow research. Finally, they identify potential research questions that are based on applications of the proposed research models.
1993年至2003年间,美国急诊科的就诊人次增加了26%,达到每年总计1.14亿人次。与此同时,美国急诊科的数量减少了400多个,近20万张住院病床停止使用。在这种背景下,系统内日常应急能力的充足性显然是一个重要问题。然而,迄今为止,关于应急能力的研究议程主要集中在大规模灾难上,如大流行性流感或严重的生物恐怖主义事件。日常应急能力的概念及其与更广泛的患者流动研究议程的关系是一个相对较新的研究领域。在本文中,作者首先描述了日常应急能力和患者流动研究议程之间的重叠。接下来,他们提出了两种模型,这些模型在日常应急能力和全院患者流动研究中都有潜在应用。最后,他们确定了基于所提出研究模型应用的潜在研究问题。