Parashos P, Messer H H
School of Dental Science, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.
Aust Dent J. 2005 Dec;50(4):251-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00369.x.
Rotary NiTi technology was introduced into Australia approximately 10 years ago. Little information is available in the dental literature to explain the adoption of new technology in dentistry. The aim of this paper is to identify and describe demographic features in the uptake of rotary NiTi technology within Australia.
In 2001, a questionnaire survey was mailed to a stratified systematic sample of general dentists and endodontists in Australia. The numbers of dentists in each state adopting the new technology were recorded and the results tabulated and graphed.
The response rate for the survey was 87 per cent. Overall, 26 per cent of responders used rotary NiTi instruments with a significantly higher proportion of endodontists (64 per cent) than general dentists (22 per cent). A significantly lower proportion of South Australian metropolitan general dentists used rotary NiTi compared with metropolitan dentists in all other states combined. The rate of uptake by South Australian dentists was lower than the other states. A significantly higher proportion of Queensland endodontists were using rotary NiTi compared with endodontists in New South Wales. A significantly greater proportion of rural dentists had tried and abandoned the new technology than metropolitan dentists.
The adoption of rotary NiTi in Australia appears to conform to diffusion of innovation theory and has reached a critical mass making it self-sustaining.
旋转镍钛技术大约在10年前被引入澳大利亚。牙科文献中几乎没有信息可用来解释牙科新技术的采用情况。本文旨在识别和描述澳大利亚采用旋转镍钛技术的人口统计学特征。
2001年,向澳大利亚普通牙医和牙髓病医生的分层系统样本邮寄了一份问卷调查。记录每个州采用新技术的牙医数量,并将结果制成表格和图表。
调查的回复率为87%。总体而言,26%的回复者使用旋转镍钛器械,牙髓病医生的比例(64%)显著高于普通牙医(22%)。与其他所有州的大都市牙医相比,南澳大利亚大都市的普通牙医使用旋转镍钛器械的比例显著更低。南澳大利亚牙医的采用率低于其他州。与新南威尔士州的牙髓病医生相比,昆士兰州牙髓病医生使用旋转镍钛器械的比例显著更高。与大都市牙医相比,农村牙医尝试并放弃新技术的比例显著更高。
旋转镍钛技术在澳大利亚的采用似乎符合创新扩散理论,并且已达到临界数量,使其能够自我维持。