Department of Endodontics, University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
J Endod. 2020 Mar;46(3):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Information is scarce regarding current usage practices of nickel-titanium (NiTi) engine-driven instruments in clinical practice. Therefore, the specific purpose of this survey was to assess trends among endodontists regarding the use and reuse of NiTi instruments.
A 16-question survey was sent by e-mail to about 4000 active members of the American Association of Endodontists. Data were collected over a 6-month period and compared using chi-square tests.
A total of 957 surveys were collected (response rate = 23%). Of the respondents, 40.2% worked in solo practices; among them, there were significantly fewer recent graduates (<10 years) compared with those who graduated more than 10 years ago. Furthermore, 41.7% were in a group practice, 4.3% in corporate practice, 10.7% in university settings, and 3% in the military. Overall, 98.3% of respondents reported using NiTi instruments. Respondents who graduated less than 25 years ago use NiTi instruments significantly more (99%) than those who graduated more than 25 years ago (92.6%). Although 22.9% of respondents buy presterilized instruments, 41.6% sterilize them before use, and 35.5% do not sterilize new instruments before use; dental officers in the military reported that they use sterile new instruments in 100% of cases. NiTi instruments were reused by 74% of respondents. The 2 largest segments of the specialist endodontic instrument market belonged to Dentsply (York, PA; 56.9%) and EdgeEndo (Albuquerque, NM; 28.8%).
There are significant differences in the use of NiTi instruments among types of practice and years since graduation. There were noticeable changes compared with findings reported about 10 years ago.
关于镍钛(NiTi)机动器械在临床实践中的当前使用情况,相关信息十分有限。因此,本调查的具体目的是评估牙髓病学家在 NiTi 器械使用和再使用方面的趋势。
通过电子邮件向美国牙髓病学会的约 4000 名活跃成员发送了一份 16 个问题的调查问卷。在 6 个月的时间里收集了数据,并使用卡方检验进行了比较。
共收集了 957 份调查问卷(回复率=23%)。在应答者中,40.2%的人在单独执业;其中,最近毕业(<10 年)的人明显少于 10 年前毕业的人。此外,41.7%的人在团体执业,4.3%的人在公司执业,10.7%的人在大学环境中执业,3%的人在军队中执业。总体而言,98.3%的应答者报告使用 NiTi 器械。毕业不到 25 年的应答者比毕业超过 25 年的应答者(92.6%)更频繁地使用 NiTi 器械(99%)。尽管有 22.9%的应答者购买预消毒器械,但 41.6%的人在使用前对其进行消毒,35.5%的人在使用前不对新器械进行消毒;军队中的牙科官员报告说,他们在 100%的情况下使用无菌的新器械。74%的应答者对 NiTi 器械进行了再使用。专科牙髓病器械市场的前 2 大份额属于登士柏(宾夕法尼亚州约克;56.9%)和 EdgeEndo(新墨西哥州阿尔伯克基;28.8%)。
在实践类型和毕业年限方面,NiTi 器械的使用存在显著差异。与大约 10 年前报告的发现相比,出现了明显的变化。