Cecere María Carla, Vázquez-Prokopec Gonzalo M, Ceballos Leonardo A, Gurevitz Juan M, Zárate Joaquín E, Zaidenberg Mario, Kitron Uriel, Gürtler Ricardo E
Laboratorio de Eco-Epidemiología, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Med Entomol. 2006 Sep;43(5):902-9. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[902:ctoeop]2.0.co;2.
The effects of different pyrethroid insecticides, formulations, and doses on peridomestic populations of Triatoma infestans (Klug) were evaluated in 128 houses with 148 identified infested peridomestic sites in northwestern Argentina between October 2003 and March 2005. Four treatments were randomly assigned within each community: two doses of 5% suspension concentrate beta-cypermethrin in water applied with manual compression sprayers, the standard dose (S) at 50 mg and a double dose (2S) at 100 mg active ingredient (AI)/m2; and two emulsifiable concentrates diluted in diesel fuel and applied with power sprayers, 25% cypermethrin (100 mg [AI] /m2) (CF) and 10% permethrin (170 mg [AI]/m2) (DF). Infestation was assessed by timed manual collections with a dislodging agent at baseline, 5, 12, and 17 mo postspraying, and the sites found to be reinfested at 5 mo postspraying were selectively resprayed. Only 2S eliminated T. infestans from all peridomestic sites up to 12 mo postspraying, and it was significantly more effective than all other treatments. At 5 mo postspraying, more sites treated with CF or DF rather than S had bug colonies that probably represented residual foci, which they also failed in eliminating after a second spray. At 17 mo postspraying, the prevalence of reinfested peridomestic sites was 5% for 2S, 29% for S, 43% for CF, and 54% for DF. The application of suspension concentrate pyrethroids in dose twice as large as that currently in use in the attack phase produces a greater initial impact and may eliminate peridomestic populations of T. infestans.
2003年10月至2005年3月期间,在阿根廷西北部128所房屋中,对148个已确定的家栖感染地点的家栖种群,评估了不同拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂、制剂和剂量对侵扰锥蝽(Klug)的影响。在每个社区内随机分配四种处理方法:两种剂量的5%高效氯氰菊酯水悬浮剂,使用手动压缩喷雾器施用,标准剂量(S)为50毫克,双倍剂量(2S)为100毫克活性成分(AI)/平方米;以及两种用柴油稀释并使用动力喷雾器施用的乳油,25%氯氰菊酯(100毫克[AI]/平方米)(CF)和10%氯菊酯(170毫克[AI]/平方米)(DF)。在基线、喷洒后5个月、12个月和17个月时,使用驱避剂通过定时人工收集来评估感染情况,对在喷洒后5个月发现再次感染的地点进行选择性重新喷洒。只有2S在喷洒后12个月内从所有家栖地点消灭了侵扰锥蝽,并且其效果明显优于所有其他处理方法。在喷洒后5个月,用CF或DF而非S处理的地点有更多的虫群,这些虫群可能代表残留疫源地,在第二次喷洒后它们也未能消除。在喷洒后17个月,家栖地点再次感染的患病率,2S为5%,S为29%,CF为43%,DF为54%。在攻击阶段,施用剂量为目前使用剂量两倍的拟除虫菊酯水悬浮剂会产生更大的初始影响,并可能消灭家栖的侵扰锥蝽种群。