Suppr超能文献

正常人类睡眠不佳的特征。

Characteristics of poor sleep with the normal human being.

作者信息

Tanaka M

出版信息

Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1975;29(2):149-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1975.tb02332.x.

Abstract
  1. To investigate the differences between good sleep and poor sleep, 41 sleep records were observed with nine normal male subjects ranging in ages from 22 to 40 years. A comparison was done of the differences of sleep records between the good and poor sleep estimations for each subject. 2. Poor sleep showed significantly shorter total sleep time (P less than 0.01) and significantly shorter stage 2 (P less than 0.05) than good sleep, but there were no differences in stages 1, 3, 4, stage REM, the percentage of every sleep stage to total sleep time, REM latency, mean REM duration, REM cycle and REM density. 3. Poor sleep showed longer latency for falling sleep (P less than 0.10) and a significant increase in stage changes from stage 2 to stage 3 (P less than 0.01) than with good sleep. 4. Poor sleep showed more prolonged awakenings and significantly longer durations spent for awakenings (P less than 0.05). 5. As to awakening in the morning poor sleep showed longer times required from terminal stage 2 and stage 4 and a significantly shorter time from terminal stage REM (stages 2 and 4, P less than 0.10, REM, P less than 0.01). 6. A certain amount of stage 4 and its decreasing seemed to be delayed in poor sleep, though its initial appearance wasn't. 7. REM periods of good sleep peaked at the third or the fourth REM stage and decreased to the fifth but those of poor sleep showed a gradual increasing from the second to the fifth having almost the same durations. 8. Awakenings in the morning often occurred from stage REM or just after an REM stage in poor sleep but in good sleep, on the other hand, occurred from stage 2. 9. The thresholds of natural wakenings from stages 3, 4 and REM of good sleep during the night might be higher than those of poor sleep.
摘要
  1. 为研究良好睡眠与不良睡眠之间的差异,观察了9名年龄在22至40岁之间的正常男性受试者的41份睡眠记录。对每个受试者良好睡眠和不良睡眠估计下的睡眠记录差异进行了比较。2. 与良好睡眠相比,不良睡眠的总睡眠时间显著缩短(P<0.01),且第二阶段睡眠时间显著缩短(P<0.05),但在第一阶段、第三阶段、第四阶段、快速眼动睡眠阶段、各睡眠阶段占总睡眠时间的百分比、快速眼动睡眠潜伏期、平均快速眼动睡眠时间、快速眼动睡眠周期和快速眼动睡眠密度方面没有差异。3. 与良好睡眠相比,不良睡眠入睡潜伏期更长(P<0.10),从第二阶段到第三阶段的阶段变化显著增加(P<0.01)。4. 不良睡眠的觉醒时间更长,且觉醒持续时间显著更长(P<0.05)。5. 至于早晨觉醒,不良睡眠从第二阶段末期和第四阶段醒来所需时间更长,而从快速眼动睡眠末期醒来所需时间显著更短(第二阶段和第四阶段,P<0.10;快速眼动睡眠阶段,P<0.01)。6. 不良睡眠中一定量的第四阶段及其减少似乎有所延迟,尽管其最初出现并无延迟。7. 良好睡眠的快速眼动睡眠期在第三或第四快速眼动睡眠阶段达到峰值,然后降至第五阶段,但不良睡眠的快速眼动睡眠期从第二阶段到第五阶段逐渐增加,各阶段持续时间几乎相同。8. 不良睡眠中早晨觉醒通常发生在快速眼动睡眠阶段或快速眼动睡眠阶段之后,而良好睡眠中的早晨觉醒则发生在第二阶段。9. 夜间良好睡眠在第三阶段、第四阶段和快速眼动睡眠阶段自然觉醒的阈值可能高于不良睡眠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验