Zhu Xiongwei, Raina Arun K, Perry George, Smith Mark A
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 USA.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2006 Sep;3(4):393-6. doi: 10.2174/156720506778249470.
Neuronal cell dysfunction and death are cardinal features of Alzheimer disease and a great deal of effort is being expended not only to understand factors involved in the cause and progression of disease (i.e., disease initiators and propagators) but, ultimately, the precise mechanism by which neurons die (for want of a better word, the terminators). Understanding each and every component of the complex pathway that ultimately leads to disease (a clinical phenotype) is clearly of paramount importance for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Of particular intrigue for many scientists, perhaps the more macabre among us, has been to decipher the final event - namely cell death. Broadly speaking, cell death falls into two categories, apoptotic and necrotic. The former, apoptosis, by definition, is a controlled event; thereby offering the potential for intervention, whereas necrosis is a more stochastic process. Since many of the propagators and exacerbators involved in Alzheimer disease are pro-apoptotic, it is not surprising that certain aspects of apoptosis are evident. However, it would be a mistake to call this apoptosis. In fact, as reviewed herein, the chronic course of disease together with the necessarily slow rate of neuronal death makes apoptotic cell death in Alzheimer disease a mathematical improbability. The numbers simply do not add up.
神经元细胞功能障碍和死亡是阿尔茨海默病的主要特征,人们正在付出巨大努力,不仅要了解与疾病病因和进展相关的因素(即疾病引发因素和传播因素),而且最终要弄清楚神经元死亡的确切机制(姑且这么说,即终结因素)。了解最终导致疾病(一种临床表型)的复杂途径中的每一个组成部分,显然对于制定有效的治疗策略至关重要。对许多科学家来说,尤其是我们当中那些比较爱钻研的人,特别感兴趣的是破解最终事件——即细胞死亡。一般来说,细胞死亡分为两类,凋亡性和坏死性。前者,即凋亡,根据定义,是一个可控事件;因此提供了干预的可能性,而坏死是一个更随机的过程。由于阿尔茨海默病中涉及的许多传播因素和加重因素都是促凋亡的,凋亡的某些方面很明显也就不足为奇了。然而,将其称为凋亡是错误的。事实上,正如本文所综述的,疾病的慢性病程以及神经元必然缓慢的死亡速度使得阿尔茨海默病中的凋亡性细胞死亡在数学上是不太可能的。数字根本对不上。